1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.362903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo study of electron transport in III–V heterostructures with doped quantum wells

Abstract: The transport properties of AlGaAs/GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures with doped GaAs quantum well have been investigated by means of an ensemble Monte Carlo method. The model accounts for nonparabolicity, size quantization in all valleys, and degeneracy. The influence of doping profile, density of donors and electrons, well width, and temperature are discussed. Both steady state and transient transport have been studied, and the possibility of strong velocity overshoot has been demonstrated. The electron velocity m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since for strong magnetic fields, E * B V * 0 , the quantum well plays only a minor role as a perturbation to electron motion, the electron energy levels lie far above the well. Thus, in the limit of strong magnetic fields the energy spectrum of electrons inside the well is described with good precision by equation (12), and for electrons outside the well it differs from equation (12) only by an additional energy from the well, V * 0 . Thus, one expects that E * n behaves as ∼ − F 2 for a large B and that is seen in figure 2(d) for E * B = 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since for strong magnetic fields, E * B V * 0 , the quantum well plays only a minor role as a perturbation to electron motion, the electron energy levels lie far above the well. Thus, in the limit of strong magnetic fields the energy spectrum of electrons inside the well is described with good precision by equation (12), and for electrons outside the well it differs from equation (12) only by an additional energy from the well, V * 0 . Thus, one expects that E * n behaves as ∼ − F 2 for a large B and that is seen in figure 2(d) for E * B = 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A more precise understanding of the physical properties of quantum wells and superlattices has become increasingly important for device applications in recent years [1]. Since infinite or finite square quantum wells are the simplest and at the same time provide most essential components for more complex quantum systems such as high-speed transistors, quantum-well lasers, resonanttunnelling diodes, etc, their behaviour in external electric and/or magnetic fields provides the subject of extensive research interest [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Recently, the influence of the simultaneous presence of both electric and magnetic fields on quantum well structures has been investigated, where the electric field and the magnetic field were chosen to be perpendicular to each other [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the input material parameter, we used the energy-band parameters for each material built in the ISE TCAD tool. However, other important electrical parameters, such as the constant low field mobility, the effective saturation velocity in the InGaAs and the AlGaAs layers, and the Schottky barrier height were newly determined by modifying the values reported in the references [17][18][19] to fit our electrical measurements on the epitaxial structures, such as Hall mobility, the sheet carrier density, and the sheet resistance. The final parameters used for the simulation are summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-If there was interaction, we place the interaction at the instant t t  and one seeks p  k   after the shock by drawing lots from a random number, its state is defined now by [12,13]: The average carrier kinetic energy as a function of electric field is shown in Figure 2 at 300 K. These curves have the shape typical of III-V compounds, which is a consequence of inter-valley transfer. At high fields, the curve for InAs suggests that the average electron energy is higher than for InP and GaAs.…”
Section: The Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%