2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montmorillonite-supported magnetite nanoparticles for the removal of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] from aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
143
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
13
143
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5, first cycle). The recovery efficiency significantly increases when the particle size decreases to 13.3 mg/g for a NP of 16 nm, which is a relatively high value in comparison with other unsupported systems reported in the literature (Chowdhury et al 2012;Yuan et al 2009). This is because the surface/volume ratio increases, thus augmenting the surface available for adsorption as a result of not only the smaller particle size but also to the dispersibility of the NPs.…”
Section: Effect Of the Nanoparticle Size On The Cr(vi) Recovery And Rmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5, first cycle). The recovery efficiency significantly increases when the particle size decreases to 13.3 mg/g for a NP of 16 nm, which is a relatively high value in comparison with other unsupported systems reported in the literature (Chowdhury et al 2012;Yuan et al 2009). This is because the surface/volume ratio increases, thus augmenting the surface available for adsorption as a result of not only the smaller particle size but also to the dispersibility of the NPs.…”
Section: Effect Of the Nanoparticle Size On The Cr(vi) Recovery And Rmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The pseudosecond-order kinetic model considers chemisorption to be the rate-limiting step, which occurs at high Cr(VI) concentrations and when the interactions of the ions and the active sites on the surface are effective. Yuan et al (2009) previously studied the adsorption of Cr(VI) on magnetite nanoparticles and also on magnetite nanoparticles supported on montmorillonite, and they concluded that supported nanoparticles present much higher efficiency for the adsorption of Cr(VI). This was attributed to the fact that the magnetite nanoparticles are better dispersed when they are supported, which makes the synthetic approach more complex.…”
Section: Isotherms and Kinetic Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetite has been applied in the adsorption of various heavy metals, e.g., Cr(VI) [27], Hg(II) [28], As(V) [25], Sb(V) [29], Se(IV) [30] and U(VI) [31]. The adsorption mechanism includes surface site binding [32], electrostatic interaction [33], modified ligand combination [34] and oxidation-reduction interaction [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aqueous media, FeOH physically on the surface of Fe 3 O 4 NPs by electrostatic attraction forces and then reduced to Cr(III) by redox reactions [35][36][37]. After physical adsorption process, chemical adsorption happens by electron exchange between FeOH + 2 and HCrO 4 ions, and Cr(VI) ions are reduced to non-toxic Cr(III) forms.…”
Section: Adsorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%