2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MoonLIGHT: A USA–Italy lunar laser ranging retroreflector array for the 21st century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantum gravity effect described in our paper can be studied with the tech- [ [57][58][59][60][61][62] …”
Section: Tiny Departure From the Equilateral Triangle Picture: Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum gravity effect described in our paper can be studied with the tech- [ [57][58][59][60][61][62] …”
Section: Tiny Departure From the Equilateral Triangle Picture: Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the quantum corrections to general relativity values for noncollinear points L 4 and L 5 look encouraging in the case of (κ 1 , κ 2 ) values appropriate to scattering potential, because corrections just below a centimeter are comparable with the purely instrumental, time-of-flight uncertainty of the geodesic positioning techniques based laser-ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. However, the total error budget of satellite/lunar laser ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] varies with the specific application and/or orbit, at the level of millimeter to centimeter. In the first part of our paper, to prepare the ground for future work, we have provided an original synthesis of the Levi-Civita analysis of the problem of motion of N bodies in general relativity, a very difficult problem that was studied, among the others, by Einstein himself with Infeld and Hoffman [17], Fock [18], Levi-Civita [19], Damour, Soffel and Xu [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new map (5.14) is such that the quantum corrected Lagrangian reads as [19,26,27], while 3 sets of quantum parameters κ 1 and κ 2 are conceivable in effective gravity [5,6,[11][12][13]. In this respect, the quantum corrections to general relativity values for noncollinear points L 4 and L 5 look encouraging in the case of (κ 1 , κ 2 ) values appropriate to scattering potential, because corrections just below a centimeter are comparable with the purely instrumental, time-of-flight uncertainty of the geodesic positioning techniques based laser-ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. However, the total error budget of satellite/lunar laser ranging [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] varies with the specific application and/or orbit, at the level of millimeter to centimeter.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Earth-Moon system, the prediction about the discrepancy between classical and quantum corrected quantities is of the order of millimeters. This magnitude is comparable with the instrumental accuracy of point-to-point laser Time-of-Flight (ToF) measurements in space typical of the modern Satellite/Lunar Laser Ranging (SLR/LLR) techniques [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]). The full positioning error budget of the orbits of satellites equipped with laser retroreflectors and reconstructed by laser ranging depends also on other sources of uncertainty (related to the specific orbit, satellite and retroreflector array), in addition to the pure point-to-point laser ToF instrumental accuracy (related to the network of laser ranging ground stations of the ILRS, i.e., the International Laser Ranging Service [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%