“…Similar to elemental phosphorus and most metal phosphide anode materials, MoP 2 also suffers from serious capacity degradation during cycling because of low electronic conductivity, poor diffusion kinetics, and significant volume change in lithiation/delithiation process. ,,,, In addition, phosphorus-rich MPs are generally prepared under strict conditions. − For phosphorus-rich MPs, the increase in phosphorus content causes the aggregation of phosphorus atoms, which further results in poor electrical conductivity and low thermal stability . Therefore, the MP products often contain phosphorus-lean impurities. ,,, Reducing particle size and constructing a carbon conductive matrix are two important routes to overcome these disadvantages and promote the application of MoP 2 as the anode for LIBs. ,, Downsizing particles to the nanoscale can alleviate volume expansion, enhance electrode–electrolyte infiltration, and decrease ion diffusion distance. ,,, However, long-term stability cannot be realized by simply controlling particle size due to the aggregation of nanoparticles. The carbon matrix can prevent nanoparticle aggregation, enhance electrical conductivity, reduce the electron transport path, and improve the lithium-ion storage performance.…”