2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jf005359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morainal Bank Evolution and Impact on Terminus Dynamics During a Tidewater Glacier Stillstand

Abstract: Sedimentary processes are known to help facilitate tidewater glacier advance, but their role in modulating retreat is uncertain and poorly quantified. In this study we use repeated seafloor bathymetric surveys and satellite-derived terminus positions from LeConte Glacier, Alaska, to evaluate the evolution of a morainal bank and related changes in terminus dynamics over a 17-year period. The glacier experienced a rapid retreat between 1994 and 1999, before stabilizing at a constriction in the fjord. Since then,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model bathymetry was constructed using data from a 5 m resolution multibeam echosounder (Reson SeaBat 7111) survey in August 2016, with data gaps filled in using two 20 m resolution fathometer (Furuno 528L) surveys in August 1999 and September 2000 (Eidam et al., 2020). Observed fjord bathymetry was then interpolated onto the 50 × 50 m model grid (Figure 1d).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model bathymetry was constructed using data from a 5 m resolution multibeam echosounder (Reson SeaBat 7111) survey in August 2016, with data gaps filled in using two 20 m resolution fathometer (Furuno 528L) surveys in August 1999 and September 2000 (Eidam et al., 2020). Observed fjord bathymetry was then interpolated onto the 50 × 50 m model grid (Figure 1d).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the volume flux of Q M is a more robust estimate of the total meltwater flux, while the average terminus melt rate should be considered an upper limit due to the unresolved contribution of icebergs. Additionally, by using a constant terminus surface area, the melt rate neglects the seasonal changes in submarine surface area (Eidam et al., 2020). The runoff flux, Q R , could include any inputs of freshwater that do not require latent heat from the ocean to undergo phase change, but we assume that runoff is dominated by subglacial discharge that drains at the bed of the glacier.…”
Section: Methods For Estimating Freshwater Fluxes From Oceanic Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapted from Eidam et al. (2020). (b) Zoom of near‐glacier region with locations of the ocean transect for budget calculations and the glacier transect for ice flux measurements—for all surveys except September 2018—and the mooring location.…”
Section: Setting and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without this important sediment source, the present-day Taku Glacier foreland may then suffer net mass loss due to erosion from the Taku and Norris Rivers. In an over-deepened basin and without a pinning point, it is unlikely that Taku Glacier will form a new proglacial shoal to slow the retreat (Eidam and others, 2020). The nearest most likely pinning point is in the vicinity of the 1890 terminus location (~7 km from the 2015 terminus) where the glacier valley narrows and undergoes a sharp turn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%