2022
DOI: 10.22495/jgrv11i1siart9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral licensing and corporate social responsibility: A systematic literature review and a research agenda

Abstract: Moral licensing describes people’s sense of ethical entitlement to morally questionable behavior after they have previously exhibited socially desired behavior. The objective of this review is to examine the concept of moral licensing in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature. To this end, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) covering the period from 2012 to 2021. First, our research explains why moral licensing is defined differently across CSR contexts. Second, we illustrate how CS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, our proposed conceptual framework might help to better understand the antecedents of organizational misconduct and enriches the ample research on the relationship between CSR and irresponsibility (Kang et al , 2016; Kotchen & Moon, 2012; Price & Sun, 2017; Riera & Iborra, 2017; Strike et al , 2006). Accordingly, future research should consider the moral licensing effect when examining the antecedents of organizational misconduct (Feldmann et al , 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, our proposed conceptual framework might help to better understand the antecedents of organizational misconduct and enriches the ample research on the relationship between CSR and irresponsibility (Kang et al , 2016; Kotchen & Moon, 2012; Price & Sun, 2017; Riera & Iborra, 2017; Strike et al , 2006). Accordingly, future research should consider the moral licensing effect when examining the antecedents of organizational misconduct (Feldmann et al , 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%