2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88428-4_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More Efficient Amortization of Exact Zero-Knowledge Proofs for LWE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One big problem of both transforms [15,29] is that, they only work for Σ protocols but not the more generic multi-round public-coin interactive proofs (PCIP). As several recent results of interactive proofs are exploiting the multiround property of PCIP to gain efficiency, such as bullet proofs [7], exact proofs [21] or amortized exact proofs [4], an interesting question would be to extend the [15,29] transforms to multi-round interactive protocols. Moreover, between these two transforms, [15] not only requires less properties of the starting Σ-protocol than [29] (optimal soundness against special soundness) but it is also more efficient.…”
Section: Limits Of Nizk In Nprommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One big problem of both transforms [15,29] is that, they only work for Σ protocols but not the more generic multi-round public-coin interactive proofs (PCIP). As several recent results of interactive proofs are exploiting the multiround property of PCIP to gain efficiency, such as bullet proofs [7], exact proofs [21] or amortized exact proofs [4], an interesting question would be to extend the [15,29] transforms to multi-round interactive protocols. Moreover, between these two transforms, [15] not only requires less properties of the starting Σ-protocol than [29] (optimal soundness against special soundness) but it is also more efficient.…”
Section: Limits Of Nizk In Nprommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the [15] transform relies heavily on the existence of an OR-composition of interactive protocols. Unfortunately, the most efficient interactive lattice-based proof systems are all 2-round protocols [4,5,21], and the previous OR-compositions of interactive proof systems [1,16,24] cannot be applied to multi-round PCIPs.…”
Section: From Interactive To Non-interactivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative to the aborts approach is probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs) and interactive oracle proofs (IOPs) cleverly combined with lattice-based algebraic techniques. For example, [10] presents a zeroknowledge system for proving knowledge of Learning With Errors (LWE) pre-images, which does not involve aborts. Unfortunately, this solution is more efficient than a general lattice-based system (with aborts) only for some specific settings, for instance, when proving at the same time knowledge of a lot of LWE pre-images with the same matrix A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We stress that the abort-free protocol in[10] is not really suitable for this setting, in terms of efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%