2014
DOI: 10.1161/circep.113.001786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More Favorable Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women Than in Men

Abstract: Women obtained greater reductions in the risk of death from any cause, cardiac cause, death or hospitalization for heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death with CRT therapy compared with men, with consistently greater echocardiographic evidence of reverse cardiac remodeling in women than in men. Further studies are needed to investigate the exact reasons for these results and determine whether indications for CRT in women should be different from men.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
8
39
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For both primary and second endpoints, females exhibited a reduction of 33% and 42% in the rate of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization or heart failure, respectively. These results are very similar to those presented in a previous meta-analysis by Cheng [67] in 2014. However, in the latter analysis, clinical factors including follow-up duration, proportions of female patients, NYHA function class, and average LVEF were not subject to sex-related differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For both primary and second endpoints, females exhibited a reduction of 33% and 42% in the rate of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization or heart failure, respectively. These results are very similar to those presented in a previous meta-analysis by Cheng [67] in 2014. However, in the latter analysis, clinical factors including follow-up duration, proportions of female patients, NYHA function class, and average LVEF were not subject to sex-related differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We calculated the I 2 (95% CI) statistic to assess heterogeneity across studies, 13 applying the following interpretation for I 2 : <50%, low heterogeneity; 50% to 75%, moderate heterogeneity; and >75%, high heterogeneity. 14,15 Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate whether the results could have been affected markedly by using fixed-effect model, trim and fill method, and different inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression models were performed to investigate potential sources of between-study heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Современным методом лечения ХСН является сердечная ресинхро-низирующая терапия (СРТ), эффекты которой приво-дят к ремоделированию сердца, уменьшению симпто-мов, снижению госпитализаций и смертности [2][3][4]. Ранее была продемонстрирована большая эффектив-ность СРТ у женщин [5][6][7][8]. Среди возможных при-чин, обусловливающих гендерную специфику ремоде-лирования сердца у женщин, были отмечены меньшие размеры сердца и длительность QRS, более высокий процент назначения β-АБ, дигоксина, антагонистов альдостерона [7], бóльшая динамика ремоделирова-ния сердца [6,9,10], более высокий процент бивен-трикулярной стимуляции [8,10,11], большая частота дилатационной кардиомиопатии [8,12] и полной бло-кады левой ножки пучка Гиса (ПБЛНПГ) [10], боль-шая частота у мужчин фибрилляции предсердий [5,7].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified