2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10463-019-00707-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More good news on the HKM test for multivariate reflected symmetry about an unknown centre

Abstract: We revisit the problem of testing for multivariate reflected symmetry about an unspecified point. Although this testing problem is invariant with respect to full-rank affine transformations, among the hitherto few proposed tests only the test studied in [12] respects this property. We identify a measure of deviation ∆ (say) from symmetry associated with the test statistic T n (say), and we obtain the limit normal distribution of T n as n → ∞ under a fixed alternative to symmetry. Since a consistent estimator o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since |CS ± (t,X j )| ≤ 2 and | j (t) + j (t)| ≤ 2||t|| 2 ||Δ j || 2 , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields Proof of Theorem 11. The proof is similar to the proof of theorem 5 of Henze and Mayer (2020) and will therefore only be sketched. From ( 26), (23), and (30), we have 2 a = ∑ 4 i,j=1 i,j a , where i,j a = 4 ∫ ∫ L i,j (s, t)z(s)z(t)w a (s)w a (t) dsdt, and L i,j (s,t) is given in (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since |CS ± (t,X j )| ≤ 2 and | j (t) + j (t)| ≤ 2||t|| 2 ||Δ j || 2 , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields Proof of Theorem 11. The proof is similar to the proof of theorem 5 of Henze and Mayer (2020) and will therefore only be sketched. From ( 26), (23), and (30), we have 2 a = ∑ 4 i,j=1 i,j a , where i,j a = 4 ∫ ∫ L i,j (s, t)z(s)z(t)w a (s)w a (t) dsdt, and L i,j (s,t) is given in (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 5 of [33] and will therefore only be sketched. From ( 26), ( 23) and ( 30), we have σ 2 a = 4 i,j=1 σ i,j a , where σ i,j a = 4 L i,j (s, t)z(s)z(t)w a (s)w a (t) dsdt, and L i,j (s, t) is given in (32).…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general theory and specific conditions under which (2.4)-(2.6) hold true have been presented by using a Hilbert space approach, in Baringhaus et al (2017) and Henze and Mayer (2020), for distributional homogeneity and symmetry-equivalence testing, respectively.…”
Section: Test Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand the problem of testing "model equivalence" has only recently been considered in a more general context, beyond that of testing about a single parameter. We refer to Dette and Munk (1998), Janssen (2000), Freitag et al (2007), Baringhaus et al (2017), Dette et al (2018), Möllenhoff et al (2019), and Henze and Mayer (2020), for testing model equivalence (or "neighborhood-of-model validation") in various settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%