More is not always better: The differentiated influence of empathy on different magnitudes of creativity

Abstract

Recently, researchers have argued about the importance of social aspects in creativity. Based on these arguments, one could hypothesize that if creativity is indeed about social aspects, then a social ability, such as empathy, will be relevant for creativity as an “interface” allowing the person to connect with others. A thorough review of the literature suggests that the association between empathic abilities and creativity may not be as straightforward as this hypothesis and also two recent empirical studies have suggested. This could be attributed to the fact that creativity may involve quite different levels such as creative achievement or everyday creativity. We suggest that social interaction, and with it empathy, plays a larger role in creative achievement than in everyday creative activities. Furthermore, we argue that too much empathy hinders everyday creativity. To explore the impact of empathy on different magnitudes of creativity, we applied two different self-report measures of creativity: creative achievement was measured by the Creative Achievement Questionnaire, while everyday creative activity was measured by the Creative Behavior Inventory. We used the Interpersonal Reactivity Index to measure empathy. Empathy had a positive correlation to achievement, but an inverted-U relationship to everyday creativity. We conclude that more connectedness is not always better for creativity. Therefore, the relevance of social aspects for creativity should not be generalized, but may depend on the magnitude of creativity considered.

Does spirituality correlate with students’ empathy during covid-19 pandemic? the case study of Indonesian students

“…So that the relevance of empathy needs to be considered in terms of levels and usefulness. Form & Kaernbach (2018) states that having many social relationships with others does not always have a good effect on individuals, including efforts to increase creativity.…”

“…Empathy refers to the ability to come to other people's reference structures and perceive what they feel (Rogers, 1956). Recent research reveals the importance of empathy in increasing creativity, so it can be concluded that social aspects including empathy, are one component in creativity (Form & Kaernbach, 2018). Regarding the Callous-Unemotional (CU) trait, empathy negatively correlates with cognitive and emotional aspects (Lethbridge et al, 2017).…”

Think Hard or Think Smart: Network Reconfigurations After Divergent Thinking Associate With Creativity Performance

“…Regarding the overall AUT performances, the evaluated originality and fluency were 0.33 ± 0.11 and 3.1 ± 1.0, respectively. The CAQ scores were adjusted by the log-transform (Form and Kaernbach, 2018), and the log(CAQ) scores exhibited a positive trend toward the AUT fluency (r = 0.30, p = 0.06), without prominent relationships with originality (r = 0.22, p = 0.16) for all participants. To test the difference in brain activity between high and low creativity individuals, the following results were divided into two groups with equal sample size (n = 20 for each group); where their CAQ scores were 16.6 ± 12.2 for the high-creative group and 5.0 ± 1.9 for the low-creative group.…”

A Multilevel Review of Curvilinear Effects on the Creative Work of Teams

“…Further research on behavioral indicators of creative work at the individual level uses Zhang and Bartol’s (2010b) measurement of creative process engagement (e.g., Du et al, 2019; Yuan et al, 2018), which describes “employee involvement in creativity-relevant methods or processes, including (1) problem identification, (2) information searching and encoding, and (3) idea and alternative generation” (Zhang & Bartol, 2010a, p. 108). In the last group of studies (e.g., Form & Kaernbach, 2018; Wigert et al, 2012), Hocevar’s (1979) creative behavior inventory is used to measure behavioral indicators of individuals’ creative work. This measure contains activities and accomplishments that are commonly considered to be creative.…”