“More than the Interview”. Overview of the section “Oral History of Philosophy” in the Journal “Filosofska Dumka”

Yosypenko, Serhii

doi:10.22240/sent38.02.086

Sent

2019

DOI: 10.22240/sent38.02.086

|View full text |Cite

“More than the Interview”. Overview of the section “Oral History of Philosophy” in the Journal “Filosofska Dumka”

Serhii Yosypenko¹

Abstract: 3 липня 2019 року в Інституті філософії імені Г.С. Сковороди НАН України відбувся круглий стіл на тему усної історії філософії, організований часописом «Філософська думка». Після круглого столу редакція запропонувала учасникам допрацювати свої виступи, котрі своєю чергою були видрукувані в «письмовому форматі» круглого столу в 4 числі часопису за цей рік. Відтак, взявшись писати огляд, автор цих рядків опинився перед запитанням, добре знайомим кожному історикові: що саме є предметом цього огляду? Подія, котра … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

History of the Kyiv Philosophical School in the oral recollections of its creators (the era of The Executed Renaissance)

Vdovychenko¹

2021

UCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with the revival by the Kyiv philosophical school of the second half of the 20th century of the first academic research on the history of Ukrainian philosophy, interrupted in the 1930s. These studies were a component of the innovative project of P. Kopnin and V. Shynkaruk as the directors of the H. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy and were carried out in the contradictory conditions of the Khrushchev "thaw" and stagnation by the illustrious generation of the philosophers-Sixtiers of the Ukrainian SSR. Their memories were mainly realized in T. Chaika's pro- ject "The Philosophers' Oral Histories" in the form of autobiographical reconstructions of S. Krymskyi, P. Yolon, V. Horskyi and M. Popovych and also in the corresponding reconstructions of their colleagues Y. Golovakha, M. Kashuba and Y. Stratii, carried out by the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The study, mainly, of these memories testifies to the general attention of these scholars to Ukrainian studies as one of the main vectors of the research work of the mentioned institute in the second half of the 20th century. Analysis of their contribution to the study of the history of Ukrainian philosophy on the basis of the alternative data received from them in this projects already in independent Ukraine significantly changes the traditional vision of started by the Kyiv philosophical school in the 1950s cen- sored study of the "philosophical front" of the Ukrainian SSR during the Executed Renaissance. These interviews with S. Krymskyi, E. Golovakha, V. Horskyi, as well as the interviews and memoirs of their colleagues, revealed a little-known problematic interpretation by the creators of the Kyiv philosophical school of their place and role in the history of Ukrainian philosophy as the leading heirs of started in the 1920s institutionalization of the domestic national philosophical tradition.

show abstract

History of the Kyiv Philosophical School in the oral recollections of its creators (the era of The Executed Renaissance)

Vdovychenko¹

2021

UCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Conceptualizing the Oral History of Philosophy: The Interview Problem

Khoma¹

2023

Sent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper determines the status of the “Oral History of Philosophy” within the history of philosophy as a discipline. The author formulates his theses as answers to the fundamental questions Serhii Yosypenko asked in 2019. The latter subjected the first attempts to comprehend the then-new concept of “Oral History of Philosophy” to fruitful criticism. It is in response to his criticisms that the former gives now his answers which can be summarized in six points: (1) Oral History of Philosophy is fundamentally different from Oral History and is not limited to the application of the interview method; (2) it is a set of dialogical methods of producing new information in the field of the history of philosophy, that is, a new methodology that can be used in any historical-philosophical research; (3) the main difference is the orientation of the Oral History of Philosophy not to personal testimony, but to joint reflection; (4) this focus on reflection determines all the methods of Oral History of Philosophy; (5) the name “Oral History of Philosophy” is due to the specifics of the situation that gave rise to this methodology rather than a conscious conceptual reflection; (6) this methodology can be given a more exact name: “Dialogical forms of historical-philosophical reflection”, while the name “Oral history of philosophy” can be used for those dialogical forms that rely on oral speech.

show abstract

Orality as an Element of Historicо-Philosophical Research

Reva

2024

Sent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the current research, using methods of oral history of philosophy, oral communication (in particular, interviews) is considered only as a technical phase in preparing the final text. The author claims that the primary audio or video recordings of such an interview, an "oral draft," should be considered independent material. After all, the written text does not reflect the interlocutors' intonations; comparing the source material and the final text may become important for future researchers. After the transcribed and agreed text of the interview took its final shape, it should be analyzed by the interlocutors and supplemented with a commentary. This commentary aims to (1) clarify vague points of the text and (2) record the further opinions of the interviewer and interviewee. Therefore, the purpose of an interview that uses an oral history of philosophy should be an audio/video recording, a final text, and a commentary.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

“More than the Interview”. Overview of the section “Oral History of Philosophy” in the Journal “Filosofska Dumka”

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

History of the Kyiv Philosophical School in the oral recollections of its creators (the era of The Executed Renaissance)

History of the Kyiv Philosophical School in the oral recollections of its creators (the era of The Executed Renaissance)

Conceptualizing the Oral History of Philosophy: The Interview Problem

Orality as an Element of Historicо-Philosophical Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About