2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphing rhesus monkey vocalizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the vocal tract lengths of rhesus monkeys were increased or decreased virtually using this software ( Ghazanfar et al, 2007 ). Chakladar et al (2008) demonstrated that the vocalizations of different macaque individuals could be morphed using this software, and the quality of the morphs was evaluated by human listeners. In the present study, the time taken by both monkeys and humans to release the lever increased gradually with an increase in the morph proportion ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the vocal tract lengths of rhesus monkeys were increased or decreased virtually using this software ( Ghazanfar et al, 2007 ). Chakladar et al (2008) demonstrated that the vocalizations of different macaque individuals could be morphed using this software, and the quality of the morphs was evaluated by human listeners. In the present study, the time taken by both monkeys and humans to release the lever increased gradually with an increase in the morph proportion ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular choice for such work is to use the STRAIGHT algorithm, which can morph broadly similar sounds on the basis of several manually specified landmarks that identify corresponding parts of the two spectrograms (Kawahara et al, 1999). For example, this technique was used to demonstrate categorical perception of macaque vocalizations by human listeners (Chakladar, Logothetis, & Petkov, 2008), to study acoustic features enabling individual recognition in macaques (Furuyama, Kobayasi, & Riquimaroux, 2017), and to prepare morphs of emotional vocalizations for a neuroimaging study (Salvia et al, 2014).…”
Section: How Does Soundgen Compare To the Alternatives?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although different pools of neurons may be differentially sensitive to specific acoustic features (Averbeck and Romanski, 2004, 2006; Freeman et al, 2013; Kusmierek et al, 2012), our data could not identify any such relationship nor could we identify one in the literature. To address this question, AL activity should be recorded in response to synthetic vocalizations (Chakladar et al, 2008; DiMattina and Wang, 2006) that allow for systematic manipulations of these acoustic features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%