Abstract:Knowledge of the quantitative anatomy of the facets may help improve clinical diagnosis and treatment. These data also may aid in constructing more realistic computer simulations.
“…The combination of clinical factors and radiologic findings may be helpful for the initial diagnosis of lumbar facet joint syndrome, but it is limited and unreliable . Consequently, although the false‐positive rate of a single diagnostic block is as high as 38%, it is still generally accepted that invasive diagnostic blocks (intra‐articular blocks or medial branch blocks) are the most reliable methods for diagnosing lumbar facet joints as low back pain generators . For these reasons, we used the comprehensive criteria of clinical factors and radiologic findings for the initial diagnosis of lumbar facet joint syndrome, and applied diagnostic blocks for the confirmed diagnosis.…”
Both autologous PRP and LA/corticosteroid for intra-articular injection are effective, easy, and safe enough in the treatment of lumbar facet joint syndrome. However, autologous PRP is a superior treatment option for longer duration efficacy.
“…The combination of clinical factors and radiologic findings may be helpful for the initial diagnosis of lumbar facet joint syndrome, but it is limited and unreliable . Consequently, although the false‐positive rate of a single diagnostic block is as high as 38%, it is still generally accepted that invasive diagnostic blocks (intra‐articular blocks or medial branch blocks) are the most reliable methods for diagnosing lumbar facet joints as low back pain generators . For these reasons, we used the comprehensive criteria of clinical factors and radiologic findings for the initial diagnosis of lumbar facet joint syndrome, and applied diagnostic blocks for the confirmed diagnosis.…”
Both autologous PRP and LA/corticosteroid for intra-articular injection are effective, easy, and safe enough in the treatment of lumbar facet joint syndrome. However, autologous PRP is a superior treatment option for longer duration efficacy.
“…Facet joints are well innervated by the medial branches of the dorsal rami and contain free and encapsulated nerve endings, nociceptors and mechanoreceptors [4]. They have been shown to be a source of pain in the neck and related pain in the head and upper extremities [5][6][7][8][9][10]. In 2% to 10% of the cases, facet-joint-associated pain results in incapacity to perform daily activities.…”
US-guided intra-articular injections show the same therapeutic effect as CT-guided intra-articular injections and result in a significant reduction of procedure duration without any exposure to radiation.
Objective:The authors evaluate the anatomic subtleties of lumbar facets and assess the feasibility and effectiveness of use of ‘Goel facet spacer’ in the treatment of degenerative spinal canal stenosis.Materials and Methods:Twenty-five lumbar vertebral cadaveric dried bones were used for the purpose. A number of morphometric parameters were evaluated both before and after the introduction of Goel facet spacers within the confines of the facet joint.Results:The spacers achieved distraction of facets that was more pronounced in the vertical perspective. Introduction of spacers on both sides resulted in an increase in the intervertebral foraminal height and a circumferential increase in the spinal canal dimensions. Additionally, there was an increase in the disc space or intervertebral body height. The lumbar facets are more vertically and anteroposteriorly oriented when compared to cervical facets that are obliquely and transversely oriented.Conclusions:Understanding the anatomical peculiarities of the lumbar and cervical facets can lead to an optimum utilization of the potential of Goel facet distraction arthrodesis technique in the treatment of spinal degenerative canal stenosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.