2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological analysis and classification of types of surface corrosion damage by digital image processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choi and Kim in Ref. [11] proposed a method of detecting corroded areas on aerospace materials and classifying these areas according to their characteristics. A similar study is also reported in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi and Kim in Ref. [11] proposed a method of detecting corroded areas on aerospace materials and classifying these areas according to their characteristics. A similar study is also reported in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following step, however, proposed rust detection by various rust types and levels, which all emphasised different algorithms, then the area of rust is then calculated to determine the degree of rust spread, and finally, a solution is proposed in the preferred maintenance to carry out. On the outer surface of pipes and structures, [9], [10] utilised statistic measurements of the picture pixels in quantifying pitting while [11] corrosion detection was based on the morphology of the surface such as colour, shape surface roughness, etc. Medeiros [12] also proposed a method based on describing the surface texture of the material obtained from the co-occurrence matrix and colour.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process includes five main steps: (1) taking photos of the structure using a digital camera, (2) preparing the images before the main analysis, (3) selecting the part of the picture to be analyzed, (4) extracting differences by comparing the images, and (5) interpreting the results from the previous step and detecting the flaws Huang, et al, 2009). The efficiency of the method in detection of different flaws like cracks (Abdel-Qader & Kelly, 2003;Hutchinson & Chen, 2006;Yamaguchi & Hashimoto, 2010;Subirats, et al, 2006;Zou, et al, 2012), corrosions (Choi & Kim, 2005;Lee, et al, 2006) or even online monitoring of cable bridges (Ho, et al, 2013;Fukuda, et al, 2013) has been proven by various studies.…”
Section: Acoustic Moment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%