2009
DOI: 10.12657/folmal.008.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and allozymic variation within and between populations of Bythinella Moquin-Tandon, 1855 (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). III. Phylogenetic analysis

Abstract: Phylogenetic relationships among 20 Central European populations of the genus Bythinella have been reconstructed on the basis of morphological characters and allozymic variation presented in our previous papers. Fitch-Margoliash additive trees based on Euclidean distances were constructed for morphological data, and genetic distances (Prevosti, unbiased Nei, Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards arc distances) were computed. Of all the genetic trees which were fairly similar, those based on Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards arc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only Bythinella gloeeri (Clade III) and Bythinella stoychevae (Clade II) have been found to be molecularly distinct from Bythinella hansboetersi (Clade I). However, all morphological character states given in the descriptions of the Bulgarian species are variable even within a population in Bythinella (Falniowski 1987, Mazan 2000, Mazan and Szarowska 2000a, b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only Bythinella gloeeri (Clade III) and Bythinella stoychevae (Clade II) have been found to be molecularly distinct from Bythinella hansboetersi (Clade I). However, all morphological character states given in the descriptions of the Bulgarian species are variable even within a population in Bythinella (Falniowski 1987, Mazan 2000, Mazan and Szarowska 2000a, b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true for Bythinella spp., which show particularly high levels of uncertainty in species delimitation (e.g. Giusti & Pezzoli, 1977; Mazan & Szarowska, 2000; Szarowska & Wilke, 2004; Haase et al. , 2007; Benke et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%