2021
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2021.1897377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and genetic diversification ofRussula floriformis, sp. nov., along the Isthmus of Panama

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a tropical African origin has long been posited for Russulaceae based on endemism and morphological distinctiveness (Pirozynski, 1983; Buyck et al ., 1996). In the wider Neotropics, Russulaceae occur in all highland and lowland regions where ECM vegetation is found, and modern work has revealed a plethora of new species (Buyck & Ovrebo, 2002; Miller et al ., 2002, 2012; Wartchow & Cavalcanti, 2010; Cheype & Campo, 2012; Sà et al ., 2013, 2019; Sà & Wartchow, 2013, 2016; Wartchow et al ., 2013; Montoya et al ., 2014; Trierveiler‐Pereira et al ., 2014; Crous et al ., 2017; Delgat et al ., 2020; Duque Barbosa et al ., 2020; Silva‐Filho et al ., 2020; Manz et al ., 2021; Vera et al ., 2021). Several lowland neotropical Russulaceae have affinities with tropical African species (Buyck, 1990; Buyck & Ovrebo, 2002; De Crop et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a tropical African origin has long been posited for Russulaceae based on endemism and morphological distinctiveness (Pirozynski, 1983; Buyck et al ., 1996). In the wider Neotropics, Russulaceae occur in all highland and lowland regions where ECM vegetation is found, and modern work has revealed a plethora of new species (Buyck & Ovrebo, 2002; Miller et al ., 2002, 2012; Wartchow & Cavalcanti, 2010; Cheype & Campo, 2012; Sà et al ., 2013, 2019; Sà & Wartchow, 2013, 2016; Wartchow et al ., 2013; Montoya et al ., 2014; Trierveiler‐Pereira et al ., 2014; Crous et al ., 2017; Delgat et al ., 2020; Duque Barbosa et al ., 2020; Silva‐Filho et al ., 2020; Manz et al ., 2021; Vera et al ., 2021). Several lowland neotropical Russulaceae have affinities with tropical African species (Buyck, 1990; Buyck & Ovrebo, 2002; De Crop et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses from the concatenated dataset showed the existence of two major phylogenetic lineages that correspond to Amanita and Russula genera, as expected, placing M8 sample within Amanita species group (BS: 93 and BI:1.0) and the remaining samples (M1 to M7) within Russula clade (BS:100 and BI:1.0). Seven Russula subgenera as recognized by Buick et al and Vera et al [ 60 , 61 ] ( Russula ; Malodora; Brevipes; Compactae; Glutinosae; Heterophyllidia and Ingratula ) were identified in our phylogeny. In this framework, M1 clustered within the subgenus Malodora (BS:99 and BI:1.0), showing a close relationship with Russula cellulata (BS:100 and BI:1.0).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Members of this genus often constitute crucial components of forest ecosystems via their extensive associations with plants, and also likely as a food source (their fruiting bodies/mushrooms) for a variety of animals [14]. Indeed, a number of Russula species are globally recognized as edible fungi [15] and have displayed promising (biopharmaceutical) properties with respect to possessing anticancer and antioxidative activities [16,17]. The morphological classification system for Russula is characterized by brightly colored fragile caps, brittle context, amyloid warty spores, abundant sphaerocysts in a heteromerous trama, an absence of latex, and simple-septate hyphae [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%