2013
DOI: 10.1163/15685411-00002680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and molecular characterisation of Paralongidorus plesioepimikis n. sp. (Nematoda: Longidoridae) from southern Spain

Abstract: 25Paralongidorus plesioepimikis n. sp. from Spain 2 Summary -Paralongidorus plesioepimikis n. sp. is described and illustrated by light 1 microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and molecular studies from specimens collected in 2 a sandy soil in the rhizosphere of stone pine (Pinus pinea) in Bonares (Huelva Province), 3 southern Spain. The new species is characterised by a very long body (9.71-14.11 mm), a 4 rounded lip region, with a clear constriction followed by a depression posterior to the 5 amphidial ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macara (1994) reported a large list of populations belonging to the X. diversicaudatum complex, but unfortunately did not include any detailed morphometric and morphological characterizations. Results of the D2-D3 region of 28S gene obtained by Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al (2013) during a morphological and molecular phylogenetic study of subfamily Xiphineminae species belonging to the X. diversicaudatum complex suggest that the population of X. diversicaudatum (GenBank accession number: AY601624) from northern Portugal, which was not identified on the basis of detailed morphological and morphometric analysis, was a misidentification and should be considered conspecific with X. coxi europaeum Sturhan, 1984. Subsequently, the phylogenetic analysis developed by Chizhov et al (2014), during a polyphasic study based on morphological and molecular data where several new Central European X. diversicaudatum populations were incorporated, is in agreement with the idea of Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al (2013b) regarding a misidentification of the Portuguese population (GenBank accession number: AY601624) which should be considered as X. coxi europaeum.…”
Section: Xiphinema Pachydermum-subgroup Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macara (1994) reported a large list of populations belonging to the X. diversicaudatum complex, but unfortunately did not include any detailed morphometric and morphological characterizations. Results of the D2-D3 region of 28S gene obtained by Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al (2013) during a morphological and molecular phylogenetic study of subfamily Xiphineminae species belonging to the X. diversicaudatum complex suggest that the population of X. diversicaudatum (GenBank accession number: AY601624) from northern Portugal, which was not identified on the basis of detailed morphological and morphometric analysis, was a misidentification and should be considered conspecific with X. coxi europaeum Sturhan, 1984. Subsequently, the phylogenetic analysis developed by Chizhov et al (2014), during a polyphasic study based on morphological and molecular data where several new Central European X. diversicaudatum populations were incorporated, is in agreement with the idea of Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al (2013b) regarding a misidentification of the Portuguese population (GenBank accession number: AY601624) which should be considered as X. coxi europaeum.…”
Section: Xiphinema Pachydermum-subgroup Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new sequences of the 18S rRNA, D2-D3 of 28S rRNA and ITS1 rRNA genes were aligned using ClustalX 1.83 with default parameters with their corresponding published gene sequences (He et al 2005;Palomares-Rius et al 2008, 2013Pedram et al 2012).…”
Section: Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomic and systematic position of the genus Paralongidorus Siddiqi, Hooper & Klan, 1963 within the family Longidoridae (Thorne, 1935) Meyl, 1961 appears to be accepted by the scientific community, however the species composition are continuously being subject of debate (Hunt 1993, Siddiqi et al 1993, Coomans 1996, Escuer & Arias 1997, Decraemer & Robbins 2007. This genus, member of the commonly known needle nematodes, is quite diverse with about 90 valid species of migratory ectoparasites that parasitise a wide range of agronomic crops, ornamentals, and forest trees (Taylor & Brown 1997, Decraemer & Robbins 2007, Palomares-Rius et al 2013, Kornobis et al 2015, Barsi & De Luca 2017. This group of phytopathogenic species are of global interest because they cause directly damage on the roots of the host plant attributable to their ectoparasitic feeding and one species is able to transmit damaging nepoviruses (Taylor & Brown 1997, Decraemer & Robbins 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometric and morphological identification within this genus at species level is mainly based on characteristics of adult females (Escuer & Arias 1997).However, the high intraspecific variability of some diagnostic features and the great diversity in phenotypic plasticity make species identification based on gross morphology and internal anatomical features a technically difficult task even for experts. Recently, the sequencing of RNA-based markers is an increasingly powerful approach for the molecular diagnostics and for understanding their inter-and intra-genetic variability (Palomares-Rius et al 2013, Kornobis et al 2015, Barsi & De Luca 2017. Several ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes are used for molecular characterizations of these nematodes: partial 28S rRNA gene (He et al 2005, Palomares-Rius et al 2008, Pedram et al 2012, Kornobis et al 2015, Barsi & De Luca 2017, 18S rRNA gene (Palomares-Rius et al 2008, Pedram et al 2012, Kornobis et al 2015 and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA genes (Palomares-Rius et al 2008, Pedram et al 2012, Kornobis et al 2015, Barsi & De Luca 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation