2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological appearance manifolds in computational anatomy: Groupwise registration and morphological analysis

Abstract: Existing approaches to computational anatomy assume that a perfectly conforming diffeomorphism applied to an anatomy of interest captures its morphological characteristics relative to a template. However, the amount of biological variability in a groupwise analysis renders this task practically impossible, due to the nonexistence of a single template that matches all anatomies in an ensemble, even if such a template is constructed by group averaging procedures. Consequently, anatomical characteristics not capt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large differences between images are hard to be well represented by a diffeomorphism, and in practice we will have a residual between the warped and target image not captured by the transformation [14]. We account for this by concatenating the residual norm as a separate variate to the warp vector d ij 1 , weighted so that it is commensurate with the control point displacements.…”
Section: Deformable Registration Model and Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large differences between images are hard to be well represented by a diffeomorphism, and in practice we will have a residual between the warped and target image not captured by the transformation [14]. We account for this by concatenating the residual norm as a separate variate to the warp vector d ij 1 , weighted so that it is commensurate with the control point displacements.…”
Section: Deformable Registration Model and Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a metric is defined to measure the distance between evergy pair of subjects in the population. Specifically, in ABSORB, the distance between evergy pair of subjects can be defined as the intensity difference or other applicable metrics [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] .…”
Section: Self-organized Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intermediate templates guided registration methods can be classified into two categories, intermediate template generation [2528] and intermediate template selection [29, 31, 32], based on how to formulate the intermediate templates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%