2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00230-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological changes of graphite spheroids during heat treatment of ductile cast irons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
12
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following research on graphene [22], it is suggested to call these individual plates structural base units (SBU). In the present observations, it was found they have a thickness between 10 and 100 nm, values which are similar to those reported by Miao et al [5] at 120 nm and Monchoux et al [20] at 100-1,000 nm for spheroidal graphite, but also by Double and Hellawell [13] at 100 nm for lamellar graphite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following research on graphene [22], it is suggested to call these individual plates structural base units (SBU). In the present observations, it was found they have a thickness between 10 and 100 nm, values which are similar to those reported by Miao et al [5] at 120 nm and Monchoux et al [20] at 100-1,000 nm for spheroidal graphite, but also by Double and Hellawell [13] at 100 nm for lamellar graphite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…2 shows a graphite nodule whose radius is about 10 lm. Within this nodule, dark areas are metallic particles containing Fe and Si as often observed [20]. The boundary between two sectors can be seen by the change in orientation of the contrast lines, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The radial growth of the graphite conical crystals well seen in Figure 6 has been already observed using different microscopy techniques 14, 19, 26, 27. Here, for the first time it was possible to acquire high resolution images containing a nucleus in the center of the nodule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is visible in Figure , the debonding revealed in the superficial layer of spheroid seemed to pass between small metallic particles embedded in a graphite spheroid (Figure a), and between insertions of the matrix visible on the bottom of the cavity remained after spheroid removing (Figure c). According to Dierickx et al () and Monchoux et al (), these small metal inclusions could be residuals of matrix, that were closed in spheroids near the G/M interface at the austenitization stage. On both complementary surfaces, this of the spheroid and that of the cavity, individual, branched graphene layers, partially separated from each other along the “c” direction, embedded between metal particles, have been revealed (Figure b, d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Circumferential cracks (Figures ) usually appeared as a result of separation of individual shells inside graphite spheroid formed around the core during cooling and subsequent heat treatment, or through the carbon deposition at the G/M interface due to decreasing its solubility in solid solution (D'Agostino, Di Cocco, Fernandino, & Iacoviello, ; Iacoviello & Di Cocco, ). Another kind of superficial layer is formed due to a spheroid dissolution during the austenitization treatment (Figures ; Dierickx, Verdu, Reynaud, & Fougeres, ; Monchoux, Verdu, Thollet, Fougeres, & Reynaud, ). The path of the circumferential cracks usually observed in the examined spheroids was differentiated, especially in the ADI specimens after the heat treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%