2012
DOI: 10.1002/pi.4317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological, electrical and electromagnetic interference shielding characterization of vapor grown carbon nanofiber/polystyrene nanocomposites

Abstract: The influence of melt mixing conditions on the level of dispersion and the aspect ratio of vapor grown carbon nanofibers (VGCNFs) in a polystyrene (PS) matrix was studied. Final electrical and electromagnetic shielding capabilities in the 0.05–1.5 GHz frequency range are reported and discussed in the light of the composites' microstructure. The morphological study was based on analyzing scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy micrographs and measuring the VGCNF length as a function of shear mixing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The segregated composite containing graphite loading of only 7.05 vol% exhibited high electrical conductivity of 3.9 S m À1 and satisfactory EMI SE of 51.6 dB. The obtained EMI SE is much higher than the results for graphite randomly distributed CPCs, 18,25 and even comparable to the results for CPCs containing CNF, 26,27 CNT 28,29 or GNS. 4,4,5,30 It is worth mentioning that the fabrication of the segregated composite in this work is involved in mechanical mixing plus hot compaction method, without the use of any organic solvent, showing a facile, green and affordable strategy for developing efficient EMI shielding materials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The segregated composite containing graphite loading of only 7.05 vol% exhibited high electrical conductivity of 3.9 S m À1 and satisfactory EMI SE of 51.6 dB. The obtained EMI SE is much higher than the results for graphite randomly distributed CPCs, 18,25 and even comparable to the results for CPCs containing CNF, 26,27 CNT 28,29 or GNS. 4,4,5,30 It is worth mentioning that the fabrication of the segregated composite in this work is involved in mechanical mixing plus hot compaction method, without the use of any organic solvent, showing a facile, green and affordable strategy for developing efficient EMI shielding materials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…19,20 Compared to the selective distribution of llers in one phase, the selective diffusion of llers at the interface can achieve the lowest percolation threshold. 23,24 However, both chemical modication and adding a copolymer are sometimes impractical because the procedure is always complicated and expensive. When llers are added into polymer blends, the selective localization and transfer dynamics of the llers are governed by the interfacial energy between the llers and the polymer components and by the aspect ratio of the llers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been utilized to develop NC materials, namely solution processing, 9,10 melt mixing, 11,12 in situ polymerization, 13,14 wet mixing, 15,16 and dry mixing. 5,17 Each of the aforementioned compounding processes has several advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%