2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10228-017-0591-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological evidence supporting the monophyly of the family Polynemidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) and its sister relationship with Sciaenidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition has not been found elsewhere among actinopterygians and is herein interpreted to be a unique synapomorphy for the Polynemidae. This conclusion agrees in part with that of Kang et al (2017: character 15), who considered that the whole subdivision pattern of the malaris (their adductor mandibulae section 1 or A1) is unique to polynemids among perciforms. However, as we discussed above, only the lateral aponeurotic origin of the promalaris on the preopercle can be more precisely optimized as a synapomorphy for the family.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This condition has not been found elsewhere among actinopterygians and is herein interpreted to be a unique synapomorphy for the Polynemidae. This conclusion agrees in part with that of Kang et al (2017: character 15), who considered that the whole subdivision pattern of the malaris (their adductor mandibulae section 1 or A1) is unique to polynemids among perciforms. However, as we discussed above, only the lateral aponeurotic origin of the promalaris on the preopercle can be more precisely optimized as a synapomorphy for the family.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Adductor hyomandibulae , pars pterygo‐palatina , and pars pterygoidea : Adductor arcus palatini 1 (Kang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations