Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Rese 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Paradigms: Computational Structure and Unsupervised Learning

Abstract: This thesis explores the computational structure of morphological paradigms from the perspective of unsupervised learning. Three topics are studied: (i) stem identification, (ii) paradigmatic similarity, and (iii) paradigm induction. All the three topics progress in terms of the scope of data in question. The first and second topics explore structure when morphological paradigms are given, first within a paradigm and then across paradigms. The third topic asks where morphological paradigms come from in the fir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boyé and Schalchli (2019) discuss the paradigm cell finding problem, identifying the cell (but not paradigm) realized by a given form. Lee (2015) clusters forms into cells across inflection classes. Beniamine et al (2018) group paradigms into inflection classes, and Eskander et al (2013) induce inflection classes and lemmata from cell labels.…”
Section: Subtasks Of Paradigm Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyé and Schalchli (2019) discuss the paradigm cell finding problem, identifying the cell (but not paradigm) realized by a given form. Lee (2015) clusters forms into cells across inflection classes. Beniamine et al (2018) group paradigms into inflection classes, and Eskander et al (2013) induce inflection classes and lemmata from cell labels.…”
Section: Subtasks Of Paradigm Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the Linguistica algorithm for morphological learning must be called and applied flexibly over some growing data. Concretely, we tested Linguistica 5 for its ability to model morphological acquisition using Eve's data in the Brown portion (Brown, 1973) of the CHILDES database (MacWhinney, 2000), an idea sketched in Lee (2015). The child-directed speech (CDS) at different ages of the target child in the data was extracted by the PyLangAcq library (Lee et al, 2016) and fed into Linguistica 5.…”
Section: On Human Morphological Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%