2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2007.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological variability of Carex spicata Huds. utricles among plant communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, seeds, as generative organs that are only slightly influenced by environmental conditions, are important diagnostic features (but see Janyszek et al 2008;Janyszek and Jagodzinski 2009). Their high structural diversity provides the most valuable criteria for classification at species and family levels.…”
Section: 05)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, seeds, as generative organs that are only slightly influenced by environmental conditions, are important diagnostic features (but see Janyszek et al 2008;Janyszek and Jagodzinski 2009). Their high structural diversity provides the most valuable criteria for classification at species and family levels.…”
Section: 05)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomson et al (2011) suggested that unassisted and wind-dispersed seeds are the most common in desert species in India and only few species are animal-dispersed. For the genus of Carex, seed (achene) dispersal is especially not documented for the desert sedge (Busch, 2001;Janyszek et al, 2008;Abudureheman et al, 2014Abudureheman et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al 2004). The seed morphology, particularly seed-size, is not only of interest in taxonomy studies, but it is an important factor for understanding the mechanisms of species dynamics in plant communities (Janyszek et al 2008). For instance, it is proven that large seeds are less important in open and disturbed environments than in closed and shady environments (Jakobsson and Eriksson 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%