2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2363707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and electronic properties of the pentacene on cobalt interface

Abstract: In this paper, we report the structural and electronic properties of pentacene thin films grown on a polycrystalline Co film using atomic force microscopy and ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy ͑UPS͒, respectively. Investigation of this type of interface is of importance for the engineering of hybrid organometallic spintronic devices for which the use of spin polarized electrodes is a prerequisite. Uniform single crystalline areas of pentacene as large as several micrometers, with molecules arranging almos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 C, in the latter because desorption started to play a significant role. From the Arrhenius plot in Figure 4(a), we extracted E N ¼ 0.65 6 0.05 eV for 40 T 60 C. This energy scale is confirmed by ultra-violet photoemission spectroscopy measurements of a 0.4 eV energy dipole between pentacene and LSMO, 27 which is low if compared to the 1 eV found for pentacene deposited on Co. 33,34 The E N value for pentacene on LSMO can be compared with the nucleation energy found for pentacene grown on SiO 2 over the same temperature range: E N ¼ 0.78 6 0.05 eV was found for a growth rate of 0.007 nm/s, 35 which is similar to the one used in the present experiment. At higher growth rates (0.03 nm/s) P i à m¼2 E m þ i à E D ¼ 1.13 6 0.04 eV and i* ¼ 3 were reported, 36 hence E N ¼ 0.23 6 0.01 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40 C, in the latter because desorption started to play a significant role. From the Arrhenius plot in Figure 4(a), we extracted E N ¼ 0.65 6 0.05 eV for 40 T 60 C. This energy scale is confirmed by ultra-violet photoemission spectroscopy measurements of a 0.4 eV energy dipole between pentacene and LSMO, 27 which is low if compared to the 1 eV found for pentacene deposited on Co. 33,34 The E N value for pentacene on LSMO can be compared with the nucleation energy found for pentacene grown on SiO 2 over the same temperature range: E N ¼ 0.78 6 0.05 eV was found for a growth rate of 0.007 nm/s, 35 which is similar to the one used in the present experiment. At higher growth rates (0.03 nm/s) P i à m¼2 E m þ i à E D ¼ 1.13 6 0.04 eV and i* ¼ 3 were reported, 36 hence E N ¼ 0.23 6 0.01 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Considering that E N varies with the growth rate, 31 the value we extracted for pentacene on LSMO is compatible with the one for SiO 2 substrates (Figure 4(b)), assuming that at lower rates E N levels off rather than diverging. 35,37 Pentacene nucleation and growth on LSMO are much closer to those on SiO 2 than those on Co. 34 The diffusion mechanism was analysed in order to disentangle the contributions of diffusion and nucleation in E N . The surface diffusion length is defined as x s ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi D s s p , where D s is the diffusion coefficient and s is the residence time, i.e., the time the molecule moves on the substrate before attaching or desorbing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong electrical dipoles are present at many OSC/metal interfaces and these interfacial dipoles can significantly alter the non-interacting equilibrium energy levels 11,13,14,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] . Thus far, little is experimentally known about the role of these vacuum level shifts on spin injection and extraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several reports of pentacene phases showing a higher ionization potential than the bulk crystal. Tiba et al [27] have reported a 0.3 V shift of the HOMO level in a pentacene monolayer grown on cobalt, while Fukagawa et al [28] observed a 0.7 eV difference when the molecules form a monolayer in the face-on configuration, compared to molecules forming a crystal. This difference is even higher when the pentacene molecules are isolated, similarly to the gas phase, where the shift is 1.6 eV.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%