2015
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and function of the palatal dentition in Choristodera

Abstract: Choristoderes are a group of extinct freshwater reptiles that were distributed throughout Laurasia from the Middle Jurassic to the Miocene. They are inferred to have had a lifestyle similar to that of extant gavialid crocodiles, but they differed from crocodiles in retaining an extensive palatal dentition. All choristoderes had teeth on the vomers, palatines and pterygoids, and teeth are rarely present on the parasphenoid. Palatal teeth are conical, as in the marginal dentition, and form longitudinal and trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No premaxillary teeth are completely preserved in CMN 8920, but plicidentine infolding is seen internally near the base of the fragmentary premaxillary teeth. Overall, the marginal teeth show a trend of decreasing size posteriorly (6 mm at 21st alveoli, 2 mm at 47th alveoli), a trend that is consistent with previous descriptions of Champsosaurus and other neochoristoderes (Matsumoto & Evans, 2016).…”
Section: Dentitionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…No premaxillary teeth are completely preserved in CMN 8920, but plicidentine infolding is seen internally near the base of the fragmentary premaxillary teeth. Overall, the marginal teeth show a trend of decreasing size posteriorly (6 mm at 21st alveoli, 2 mm at 47th alveoli), a trend that is consistent with previous descriptions of Champsosaurus and other neochoristoderes (Matsumoto & Evans, 2016).…”
Section: Dentitionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This trough is shallow in CMN 8920 compared with those of other Champsosaurus specimens (e.g. TMP 87.36.41, TMP 94.163.01, TMP 86.12.11, CMN 8919; Matsumoto & Evans, ), likely due to crushing of the palatal region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These animals were primarily aquatic (Katsura, 2010), preying on fish and other aquatic organisms (Matsumoto et al, 2009). The exact phylogenetic position of Choristodera within Diapsida is debated due to the sudden appearance of derived choristoderes in Upper Jurassic deposits, and an absence of specimens from their early evolutionary history (Matsumoto and Evans 2010;Matsumoto and Evans 2016). Of the two main clades within Diapsida (Neodiapsida and Araeoscelidia; Gaffney 1980;Evans 1988), Evans (1990) noted that choristoderes share more features with Neodiapsida, with the exception of the palatal dentition and absence of the mandibular retroarticular process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%