2014
DOI: 10.4081/entomologia.2014.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of a new blister beetle (Coleoptera, Meloidae) larval type challenges the evolutionary trends of phoresy-related characters in the genus Meloe

Abstract: The discovery of some specimens of a new first instar larval type in\ud blister beetles, collected in Iran on Anthophora bees, confirms the\ud existence of repetitive and parallel trends in morphological specialization\ud to phoresy in distinct lineages of Meloidae and in particular in the\ud subfamily Meloinae. The new Iranian larva, herein described and illustrated,\ud shows several characters and a peculiar phoretic strategy that\ud closely parallel that of the Meloe subgenus Lampromeloe, with similar\ud mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also changes the phylogenetic placement of some taxa. Consequently, some previous hypotheses on character evolution and homoplasy in the group need to be reinterpreted, particularly those regarding the morphological traits of first‐instar larvae, which have been widely used to support or reject evolutionary groups within Meloini (Bologna, 1988, 1991; Bologna et al., 1989, 1990; Bologna & Pinto, 2001; Di Giulio et al., 2002, 2013, 2014; Pinto & Bologna, 1993; Selander, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also changes the phylogenetic placement of some taxa. Consequently, some previous hypotheses on character evolution and homoplasy in the group need to be reinterpreted, particularly those regarding the morphological traits of first‐instar larvae, which have been widely used to support or reject evolutionary groups within Meloini (Bologna, 1988, 1991; Bologna et al., 1989, 1990; Bologna & Pinto, 2001; Di Giulio et al., 2002, 2013, 2014; Pinto & Bologna, 1993; Selander, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), suggesting multiple independent origins. Studies of specific taxa, including blister beetles (Bologna & Pinto, 2001; Bologna et al ., 2008; Di Giulio et al ., 2014) and acarid mites (OConnor & Pfaffenberger, 1987), show evidence for its repeated origins within multiple clades. For the behaviour to evolve independently multiple times, the benefits must sometimes outweigh the risks.…”
Section: Evolution Of Phoretic Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larva. The morphological traits of previously known first instar larvae of Eurymeloe (triungulines), including Coelomeloe , and the descriptions of the triungulines of several additional species of Eurymeloe , have been synthesised and studied by Di Giulio et al (2013 , 2014 ). We herein refer to these works for larval morphological traits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological traits of larvae have been traditionally considered relevant in the systematics of the group, sometimes even more informative than adult characters for phylogenetic studies ( Bologna and Pinto 2001 ). In fact, traits of the first instar larva (triungulin) have been studied for most of the genera and subgenera of Meloini ( Bologna 1988 , 1991 ; Selander 1989 ; Bologna et al 1989 , 1990 ; Bologna and Pinto 1992 , 1998 ; Pinto and Bologna 1993 ; Bologna and Aloisi 1994 ; Di Giulio et al 2002 ; Di Giulio et al 2013 , 2014 ). However, not having a resolved internal taxonomy for Eurymeloe confuses explanations of the evolutionary history of some of these traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%