2015
DOI: 10.17116/patol201577629-38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of collagen matrices for tissue engineering (biocompatibility, biodegradation, tissue response)

Abstract: The performed investigation could recommend three matrices: hybrid collagen/vicryl composite; decellularized bovine dermis; and decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa, which are most adequate for tissue engineering in urology. These and other collagen matrices may be used in different areas of regenerative medicine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of heterotopic implants supplemented our understanding of the biocompatibility of tissue engineered constructs at the tissue level. The presence of a thin connective tissue capsule without pronounced fibrosis, the absence of microcirculation and immune disorders suggest that the implanted matrices are biocompatible and non-toxic, which corresponds to the reactions to biocompatible polymer materials described in the literature [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of heterotopic implants supplemented our understanding of the biocompatibility of tissue engineered constructs at the tissue level. The presence of a thin connective tissue capsule without pronounced fibrosis, the absence of microcirculation and immune disorders suggest that the implanted matrices are biocompatible and non-toxic, which corresponds to the reactions to biocompatible polymer materials described in the literature [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Данный материал обладает низкой антигенностью и стимулирует регенерацию, выполняя роль направляющей матрицы для формирования собственной соединительной ткани пациента, поэтому оптимален для восполнения хронических дефектов мягких тканей при СДС даже в случаях глубоких и извитых раневых каналов, когда аутопластика невозможна [12]. Кроме того, введение биологического материала на основе нативного коллагена в область коррекции приводит к уменьшению активности раневых ММП и обеспечивает ткани основными биологическими ресурсами (натуральным нереконструированным коллагеном с сохраненной волокнистой структурой), который требуется для восстановления разрушенной архитектоники соединительной ткани и заживления ран [8,9,13,14].…”
Section: материалы и методыunclassified
“…Scaffolds can be produced using fibrous and porous materials made from synthetic polymers (e.g., polylactate, polycaprolactone, polylactoglycolide) or materials of natural origin (collagen, chitosan, hyaluronic acid) [ 17 ], as well as specially treated natural tissues and organs [ 25 , 26 ]. The major advantage of synthetic scaffolds fabricated by engineering methods (electrospinning, 3D printing, etc.)…”
Section: Tumor Tec Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%