“…The number and shape of the ossicles, particularly those of the gastric mill, vary between species and have been suggested as potentially useful taxonomic characters (Maynard and Dando, 1974; Meiss and Norman, 1977a, b, c). Comparative studies between decapod infraorders have been reported (for example: Patwardhan, 1935b, c, d, e, f;Schaeffer, 1970;Maynard and Dando, 1974;Powell, 1974; Meiss and Norman, 1977a, b, c; Kunze and Anderson, 1979; Suthers and Anderson, 1981;Suthers, 1984;Felgenhauer and Abele, 1989).Studies of the foreguts of nondecapod eucarid, peracarid, and syncarid malacostracans range across many taxa, including amphipods (e.g., Schmitz and Scherrey, 1983;Carlton and Schmitz, 1989;Coleman, 1991 Coleman, , 1994, isopods (e.g., Schmitz, 1986;Storch, 1987), mysids (e.g., Friesen et al, 1986; Storch, 1989), and euphausiids (e.g., Suh and Nemoto, 1988;Suh, 1990;Ullrich et al, 1991; Suh et al, 1994). Previous studies of the foregut in Syncarida (Smith, 1909;Siewing, 1956; Kunze, 1981;Oshel and Steele, 1988;Wallis, 1995) provide morphological detail and interpretation of features at a histological and SEM level.…”