2004
DOI: 10.1295/polymj.36.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology, Tensile Strength and Thermal Behavior of Isotactic Polypropylene/Syndiotactic Polystyrene Blends Compatibilized by SEBS Copolymers

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The effects of three triblock copolymers of poly[styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene] (SEBS) of different molecular weight (MW) on the morphology, tensile strength and thermal behavior of isotactic polypropylene/syndiotactic polystyrene (iPP/sPS, 80/20) blend are investigated. Morphology observation shows that both the medium MW and the lower MW SEBS are more effective than the higher MW SEBS in compatibilizing the blends. Tensile tests revels both the medium and low MW compatibilizer lead to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical phase diameter of the blend system from the equal area circle diameter measurement is tabulated in Table 2. The binary blend of PP/PS (80/20) showed the typical morphology of an immiscible blend system (Figure 4a) [22,23,24] with PS domains up to 5 µm in diameter dispersed in the PP matrix. The ternary blends showed a much smaller dispersed domain size, proving that compatibilization effectiveness more or less depended on the compatibilizer used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical phase diameter of the blend system from the equal area circle diameter measurement is tabulated in Table 2. The binary blend of PP/PS (80/20) showed the typical morphology of an immiscible blend system (Figure 4a) [22,23,24] with PS domains up to 5 µm in diameter dispersed in the PP matrix. The ternary blends showed a much smaller dispersed domain size, proving that compatibilization effectiveness more or less depended on the compatibilizer used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If emulsions of two simple liquids can be stabilized with any of those, in the case of complex liquids such as polymer-polymer interfaces, it is more efficient to use surfactants in the form of block or graft copolymers. These are composed of segments that present complementary affinities towards the two phases of the blend [63][64][65][66][67][68][69], to mimic the amphiphilic nature of low molecular weight surfactants. Of course these molecules are large, and as a result they diffuse slowly which causes slow adsorption kinetics at the interface.…”
Section: Application To Stabilization Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersion of rubbery polymers into a glassy matrix is regarded as an available approach to improving the ductility. However, due to phase separation, the improved ductility is always accompanied by an enormous sacrifice of optical clarity, considering that the soft component is neither refractive-index-matched nor sufficiently small to avoid light scattering. It also prominently faces the stiffness–ductility trade-off dilemma, , that is, the matrix shows poor strength after blending flexible components. Although several attempts have been made, achieving the balance of stiffness, ductility and transparency of glassy polymers remain key challenges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%