2008
DOI: 10.1002/app.27614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology, thermal expansion, and electrical conductivity of multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites

Abstract: Multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites loaded with up to 0.5 wt % multiwalled carbon nanotubes were prepared and characterized. Infrared microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, thermomechanical analysis, and electrical conductivity measurements of the composites were performed. Infrared microscopy and scanning electron microscopy images showed that the debundled nanotubes were well dispersed. The thermal expansion coefficients, before and after the g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) an open structure consisting of entangled bundles, with diameters between 50 and 200 nm. The BET specifi c surface area, measured by nitrogen adsorption, is 136 m 2 /g [24]. The MWNT material presents a fraction of residual metal of approximately 6 wt% (calculated as ~70% of the final residue weight, corresponding to either Ni, Co, or Fe metallic oxides), as shown by the thermogravimetric residue of ~ 9 wt% in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1) an open structure consisting of entangled bundles, with diameters between 50 and 200 nm. The BET specifi c surface area, measured by nitrogen adsorption, is 136 m 2 /g [24]. The MWNT material presents a fraction of residual metal of approximately 6 wt% (calculated as ~70% of the final residue weight, corresponding to either Ni, Co, or Fe metallic oxides), as shown by the thermogravimetric residue of ~ 9 wt% in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The processes of covalent and noncovalent functionalization have been suggested as one of the options for better dispersion of nanotubes 27,[41][42][43] . The chemical modification of the nanotube surface through covalent functionalization results in reduction of the aspect ratio with the formation of sp 3 carbons on nanotube surface, which decreases the electrical conductivity of nanotubes 27,[44][45][46][47] . Therefore, as-received nanotubes were used in the present work without any functionalization, once this study is focused on the electromagnetic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the CNT production cost is higher than that of conventional fillers, its low loading is advantageous because the effects on resin properties are minimal and the same processing equipment can be used with neat resins and nanocomposites. These polymer-based nanocomposites are expected to derive high properties at low filler volume fractions due to the high aspect ratio and high surface area to volume ratio of the nano-sized particles [Zhou et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2008;Santos et al, 2008]. In recent years, different types of polymer composites have been synthesized by incorporating CNTs into various polymer matrices such as polyamides [Zhao et al, 2005], polyimides [Cai et al, 2004;Ogasawara et al, 2004], epoxy [Winey et al, 2007;Hu et al, 2008;Liao et al, 2004], polyurethane [Koerner et al, 2005 ;Kuan et al, 2005], polypropylene [Seo et al, 2004;Li et al, 2004;Seo et al, 2005], polyethylene [Haggenmueller et al, 2006], polyethylene oxide [San et al, 2001], poly(vinyl alcohol) , poly(methyl methacrylate) [Jin et al, 2001], polycarbonate [Postscke et al, 2003], poly(butylene succinate) [Sinha Ray & Okomoto, 2003], polylactide [Chiu et al, 2008], polyaniline [Zing et al, 2008], polypyrrole [Sahoo et al, 2007], poly (N-vinylcarbazole) [Maity et al, 2007;Maity & Sinha Ray, 2008a ;Maity & Sinha Ray, 2008b], poly(ethylene 2, 6-naphthalate) , poly(butylenes terephthalate) [Garcia-Gutierrez et al, 2008], poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) [Kumar et al, 2002], glycopolymer and others [Fragneaud et al, 2007].…”
Section: Swcnt Graphene Sheetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite was moulded and cured at 80°C for 2 h, followed by post-cure at 150°C for 3 h. Several different combinations of CNT/GNP hybrid nanoreinforcement contents were added into the epoxy matrix, with the CNT contents ranging 0-1.0 wt% while the total filler content was maintained at 2 wt% loading. Santos et al [Santos et al, 2008] investigated the nanocomposite prepared from CVD-grown MWCNTs (diameter 10-40 nm, length 5-20 μm, surface area 136 m 2 /g), XR1555 epoxy resin and HY-951 Aradur hardener. MWCNTs were suspended in a 1 wt% SDS solution [Connel et al, 2002], and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 90 min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%