2020
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-95022020000300747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric, Anatomic and Radiographic Study of Bone of the Pelvic Limb of Endangered Patagonian Huemul Deer (Hippocamelus bisulcus)

Abstract: Currently, the Patagonian huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) is endangered. Anatomical studies focused on understanding the anatomy of the deer most threatened by extinction in South America is a challenge for anatomists, veterinarians and biologists. Research carried out for its conservation has focused mainly on its ecology and pathology, leaving gaps in anatomical knowledge, which is basic and important for a comprehensive understanding of this species. Gross anatomy and radiography of the skeleton of the pelvi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2020); Salinas, Arenas‐Caro, et al. (2020). The strongest epidemiological conclusions come from studies that use large populations with precise measurements of exposure and disease; repeated observations of event (A) which is followed by another (B) enabling to hypothesize why A causes B; biological plausibility explaining the reasonability that A causes B; proper temporal relationship—an absolute requirement, where the exposure must precede the disease; consistency as shown by the association being repeated in many studies (large effect size); and by determining the causal inference (Steenland & Moe, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(2020); Salinas, Arenas‐Caro, et al. (2020). The strongest epidemiological conclusions come from studies that use large populations with precise measurements of exposure and disease; repeated observations of event (A) which is followed by another (B) enabling to hypothesize why A causes B; biological plausibility explaining the reasonability that A causes B; proper temporal relationship—an absolute requirement, where the exposure must precede the disease; consistency as shown by the association being repeated in many studies (large effect size); and by determining the causal inference (Steenland & Moe, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salinas, Arenas‐Caro, et al. (2020) state that there is no literature about anatomical and morphometric characteristics of huemul, although Flueck and Smith‐Flueck (2011a) reported allometric comparisons between huemul and 12 other species. However, these were considered erroneous (Salinas, Núñez‐Cook, et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various studies have been performed to determine the anatomical and osteometrical properties of the main long bones of the pelvic limbs (femur, tibia, fibula) of different animal species, like mole-rats (Spalax leucodon Nordmann) [34], African giant rats (Cricetomys gambianus Waterhouse) [27], grasscutter rodents (Thryonomys swinderianus, Temminck-1827) [29], guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) [37], feral pigs (Sus scrofa) [19], martens (Martes fonia) [3], badgers (Meles meles) [32], squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) [31], hedgehogs hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus L.) [35], porcupines (Hystrix Cristata) [49], chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) [10], lumholtz tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzii) [40], Anatolian bobcats (Lynx lynx) [30], New Zealand rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) [1,16,36], marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) [9], brown bears (Ursus arctos) [13], deers (Hippocamelus bisulcus) [41], sheeps (Ovis aries) [2], gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) [12], foxes (Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus) [24], dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) [28,43], and domestic cats (Felis catus and Felis domestica) [5,16]. No study was found when the existing literature was searched for long bones of the pelvic limbs of Van cats, however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%