2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric characterization of the neuromuscular junction of rodents intoxicated with 2,4-dithiobiuret: evidence that nerve terminal recycling processes contribute to muscle weakness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capacity of the STOP null axons to regenerate and project toward the OB glomeruli favors the second hypothesis. The tubulovesicular structures were similar to those observed in nerve terminals of the neuromuscular junction following intoxication with 2,4-dithiobiuret that are associated with a decrease of synaptic vesicles density, suggesting an impairment of vesicle release and recycling [27]. At the presynaptic level, STOP protein is phosphorylated by calmodulin-dependant protein kinase II, an enzyme involved in synaptic plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The capacity of the STOP null axons to regenerate and project toward the OB glomeruli favors the second hypothesis. The tubulovesicular structures were similar to those observed in nerve terminals of the neuromuscular junction following intoxication with 2,4-dithiobiuret that are associated with a decrease of synaptic vesicles density, suggesting an impairment of vesicle release and recycling [27]. At the presynaptic level, STOP protein is phosphorylated by calmodulin-dependant protein kinase II, an enzyme involved in synaptic plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…There is growing evidence that the function of chemical synapses in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and central nervous system (CNS) can be disrupted by many structurally dissimilar electrophilic neurotoxicants, e.g., acrylamide, 2,4dithiobiuret, methylmercury, acrolein, and diethyldithiocarbamate (Table 1; Atchison and Narahasi, 1982;Atchinson et al, 1982;Danscher et al, 1973;Lowndes, 1979, 1981;LoPachin et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2002). Results from corresponding research have suggested both pre-and postsynaptic sites (e.g., neurotransmitter postsynaptic receptors and presynaptic uptake, storage, and release) as possible targets for these chemicals (LoPachin et al, 2004(LoPachin et al, , 2006aLovell et al, 2000;Nagendra et al, 1997;Rheuben et al, 2004;Vaccari et al, 1998). Whereas the molecular mechanisms of these synaptic toxicants are poorly understood, they share the ability to form adducts with or otherwise modify nucleophilic sulfhydryl groups (Barber and LoPachin, 2004;Clarkson, 1972;Kruzer, 1956;Witz, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%