2009
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.23.1_supplement.649.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometry of pedicle and vertebral body in a Mexican population by CT and Fluroscopy

Abstract: It is necessary to have precise anatomical knowledge of lumbar pedicles for the safe placement of screws. There are not reports about the morphometry of lumbar pedicles in a Mexican population exist. A descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study was done in 60 cadavers from the dissection lab of the Human Anatomy Department of the Medicine School. The aim of the study was to quantify the morphometric characteristics of the pedicles of the lumbar spine in a Mexican population. A total of 60 cadavers we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increasing pattern was observed in both male and female, the mean values of PW for female were (L1=4.4 mm; L2=5.1 mm; L3=6.4 mm; L4=8.1 mm; L5=10.5 mm) while for male they were (L1=6.8 mm; L2=7.7 mm; L3=9.0 mm; L4=10.4 mm; L5=13.3 mm) as presented in (Fig 4), the mean values of pedicle width (PW) in male was higher than in female and a significant differences were observed between the genders at each lumbar level (Table 2). This result agree with A study conducted by Urrutia Vega E. et al ( 2009) "Morphometry of Pedicle and Vertebral Body in a Mexican Population by CT and Fluoroscopy" [13], and with Singh, V. et al, in 2021 (Computed Tomographic Morphometry of Lumbar Spine in Indian Population) [14], their studies conclude that a progressive and gradual increase in the width of the pedicles from L1 to L5. However the Saudis mean pedicle width (PW) was lower than that in Mexican and Indian Population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This increasing pattern was observed in both male and female, the mean values of PW for female were (L1=4.4 mm; L2=5.1 mm; L3=6.4 mm; L4=8.1 mm; L5=10.5 mm) while for male they were (L1=6.8 mm; L2=7.7 mm; L3=9.0 mm; L4=10.4 mm; L5=13.3 mm) as presented in (Fig 4), the mean values of pedicle width (PW) in male was higher than in female and a significant differences were observed between the genders at each lumbar level (Table 2). This result agree with A study conducted by Urrutia Vega E. et al ( 2009) "Morphometry of Pedicle and Vertebral Body in a Mexican Population by CT and Fluoroscopy" [13], and with Singh, V. et al, in 2021 (Computed Tomographic Morphometry of Lumbar Spine in Indian Population) [14], their studies conclude that a progressive and gradual increase in the width of the pedicles from L1 to L5. However the Saudis mean pedicle width (PW) was lower than that in Mexican and Indian Population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%