2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2006.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometry of the midgut epithelium of Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius, 1794 (Lepidoptera) parasitized by Cotesia flavipes Cameron, 1891 (Hymenoptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant increase in the length of the midgut, as found for M. quadrifasciata anthidioides, has already been reported in Hemiptera (Billingsley 1988) and Lepidoptera (Pinheiro et al 2003, Pinheiro & Gregório 2006, Levy et al 2009. It is known that in stingless bees, the increase in midgut size during the larval stage is due to the growth of digestive cells (Cruz-Landim & Mello 1970), and to the increase in cell number due to proliferation and differentiation of regenerative cells (Serrão & CruzLandim 2000, Martins et al 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The significant increase in the length of the midgut, as found for M. quadrifasciata anthidioides, has already been reported in Hemiptera (Billingsley 1988) and Lepidoptera (Pinheiro et al 2003, Pinheiro & Gregório 2006, Levy et al 2009. It is known that in stingless bees, the increase in midgut size during the larval stage is due to the growth of digestive cells (Cruz-Landim & Mello 1970), and to the increase in cell number due to proliferation and differentiation of regenerative cells (Serrão & CruzLandim 2000, Martins et al 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Many works on peritrophic membrane secretion in Lepidoptera larvae suggest that its constituents are produced by columnar cells, preferentially in the anterior midgut region of insects (Santos et al, 1984). A previous work on parasitized D. saccharalis showed that the columnar cells present cytoplasmic and nuclear increase in the posterior midgut region of D. saccharalis larvae, due to parasitism, verified by means of morphometry (Pinheiro et al, 2006). Thus the finding of greater mitochondrial alteration in columnar cells of the anterior midgut region indicates that this region is the more affected by parasitism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Previous morphometric works show that these cells did not suffer alteration in cytoplasmic or nuclear volume during the parasitism process, in both midgut regions (Pinheiro et al, 2006), which was attributed to the high variability in the morphology of these cells, existent even in non-parasitized larvae . This variability of regenerative cells must be related to their function along the midgut; it is known that these cells may be differentiated in other epithelial cell types, presenting a high index of morphological variability (Lehane and Billingsley, 1996;Illa-Bochaca and Montuenga, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the importance of this insect, there are few works on its internal morphology, especially in reference to the midgut. The existent descriptions reference the ultrastructural differences of columnar cells , and morphometric distinctions in different cellular types (Pinheiro et al , 2006, besides biochemical differences of enzymatic activity (Azevedo et al 2003). However, none of these studies characterize morphological variations in the different cellular types along the midgut of the sugarcane borer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%