1997
DOI: 10.2979/nws.1997.9.3.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mother Earth, the Cyborg, and the Queer: Ecofeminism and (More) Questions of Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sandilands and Gaard discuss the importance of avoiding the ‘fetishization of small differences’ among feminists (Gaard, , p. 21). Indeed, both scholars have a long‐term commitment to thinking about how we as feminists can build coalition and alliances that allow us to find common cause beyond our disagreements and differences (Gaard, ; Sandilands, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandilands and Gaard discuss the importance of avoiding the ‘fetishization of small differences’ among feminists (Gaard, , p. 21). Indeed, both scholars have a long‐term commitment to thinking about how we as feminists can build coalition and alliances that allow us to find common cause beyond our disagreements and differences (Gaard, ; Sandilands, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Näin myös naisen ja luonnon läheisyys on performanssi, jota voidaan horjuttaa esittämällä sitä uusin tavoin. (Sandilands 1997. ) Naiseutta, mieheyttä, muita sukupuolia ja niiden suhdetta luontoon on siis mahdollista rakentaa erilaisiksi.…”
Section: Materialistinen Queer-ekofeminismiunclassified
“…Intersectionality emerged in part as a way of naming and addressing the lacunae in liberatory movements—such as the movement for women's suffrage in the United States—which failed to adequately acknowledge the diverse experiences among women differently positioned due to their race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other markers of identity (Crenshaw 1989). In environmental and animal ethics, intersectional approaches (though they are not always explicitly labeled as such) have been employed to understand the connections between animals, environment, and disability (Ray and Sibara 2017; Taylor 2017); the relationships between disability and environmental justice (Kafer 2013; Johnson 2017; Bretz 2020); environment and race (Finney 2014; Savoy 2015; Murdock 2020), animal ethics, colonialism, and racism (Deckha 2013; Kim 2015); gender, sexuality and the environment (Gaard 1997; Sandilands 1997); and colonialism and climate change (Agarwal and Narain 1991; Watt‐Cloutier 2015; Whyte 2016). Much of this work crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries, with some of the major contributions coming from scholars in decolonial studies, sociology, anthropology, literary theory, critical race and critical gender studies, as well as from writers outside the academy.…”
Section: Environmental and Ecological Justice: Engaging Entangled Oppressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%