In contrast to recent understandings of community beyond place, urban partnerships of developers and policymakers focus on creating place-based communities in new neighbourhoods such as master-planned housing estates. These efforts are critiqued for ignoring the multiple ways community is experienced in everyday life as physical places take precedence over social relations and processes. Drawing on the example of a master-planned community (MPC) in Australia, this article explores some of the complexities involved in attempting to create community in these and other new neighbourhoods by comparing conceptualisations of community depicted in marketing materials with future residents' expectations and lived experience. Although some notions of community portrayed in the marketing of the estate resonated with future residents' expectations, their everyday experiences of community were broad and varied, and not confined to one particular place. In concluding, the article suggests there is greater scope for the multiplicity of community to be incorporated in the planning and design of MPCs. Specifically, policymakers could make more of partnerships with developers to advocate for the acknowledgement and inclusion of broader experiences of community in everyday life.
近年来,人们一致认为共同体不受地域限制。然而开发商和政策制定者却在新建小 区, 如统一规划小区, 联手打造基于地域的共同体。这些做法遭到批评, 认为他们忽视 了人们在日常生活中感受共同体的多种方式, 将物理地区凌驾于社会关系和社会过 程之上了。本文以澳大利亚统一规划小区(MPC)为例, 比较营销宣传品中描绘的共 同体概念与居民的未来期待和现实体验 ,以探讨在这些小区以及其他新小区中建立 共同体的复杂性。尽管房地产营销宣传品中所描绘的共同体概念, 与居民的未来期 望相一致, 但居民对共同体的实际日常体验却是宽而杂 ,无法限于某一具体地点。文 章最后建议在规划和设计统一规划小区时, 扩大共同体的多元性。政策制定者特别 应该与开发商多多合作 ,鼓励共同体在日常生活中承认和包容更多样的经验。