2014
DOI: 10.5773/rgsa.v8i2.753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivações E Modos De Formação De Estratégias Ambientais No Setor Sucroalcooleiro Brasileiro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of this disclosure was as follows: social 3,411 (31.79%), environmental 1,972 (18.38%), sustainability 1,771 (16.51%), responsibility 823 (7.67%), environment 712 (6.64%), socioenvironmental 507 (4.73%) and sustainable development 299 (2.79%). This takes us back to the idea of the simple compliance with environmental legislation, without the adoption of strategic positioning of environmental management, corroborating the findings of Kronbauer and Silva (2012) and Genuíno and Machado (2014).The sectoral analysis is presented in the following section.…”
Section: Description and Analysis Of The Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of this disclosure was as follows: social 3,411 (31.79%), environmental 1,972 (18.38%), sustainability 1,771 (16.51%), responsibility 823 (7.67%), environment 712 (6.64%), socioenvironmental 507 (4.73%) and sustainable development 299 (2.79%). This takes us back to the idea of the simple compliance with environmental legislation, without the adoption of strategic positioning of environmental management, corroborating the findings of Kronbauer and Silva (2012) and Genuíno and Machado (2014).The sectoral analysis is presented in the following section.…”
Section: Description and Analysis Of The Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The distribution of the other socio-environmental terms published in the ENs was as follows: socio-environmental 1,321 (8.68%), responsibility 1,234 (8.11%), environment 284 (1.87%), sustainability 180 (1.18%) and socio-environmental 133 (0.87%). It is important to stress that the disclosure of the environmental term, the second most disclosed, did not confirm the positioning that these companies were committed to environmental preservation, in line with the presuppositions of Kronbauer and Silva (2012) and Genuíno and Machado (2014). The analysis revealed that it characterized only a strategic positioning focused simply on compliance with environmental legislation.…”
Section: Description and Analysis Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%