“…This development required the expansion of the original sociological and economic paradigm and the transition to a more adequate cultural and psychological paradigm in the interpretation of human capital [10]. Now its interdisciplinary study is carried out by attracting not only the initial sociological-economic and medical-pedagogical macrofactors, but also innovative psychological micro-aspects: differential-pedological (about the age-related development of abilities and the disclosure of the giftedness of children and youth [11]), acmeological-andragogical (about talent and culture-creating creativity of adult professionals [12]), psychological and gerontological (about the experience and skills of elderly professionals and even pensioners [13]). In its totality, all this, firstly, opens up new and promising opportunities both for reinterpreting models and methods, ideas and knowledge from the sphere of general, differential, age, social, pedagogical psychology of the development of giftedness and creativity [14], and for psychotechnical use these achievements for the constructive formation and development of human capital in the context of organizational psychology and the acmeology of labor and management.…”