Motivation, self‐efficacy, perception, curiosity, and barriers toward medical research among undergraduates in China

Abstract

Medical research is important to scientific progress and medical education.Institutions worldwide have sought to increase student involvement in research such as clinician-scientists training programs, while little is known about how medical undergraduates perceive research. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, with first-fourth year undergraduates. An online, anonymous, and self-rating 5-point Likert questionnaire was conducted to investigate medical undergraduates' demographic characteristics and assess motivation, self-efficacy, perception, curiosity, and barriers regarding medical research. Content validity was checked with experts and face validity was checked for clarity and understanding of the questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questions ranged from 0.813 to 0.879. A total of 3273 medical undergraduates were surveyed, and 86.62% (2835) participants (male 962, female 1873) were identified as effective. Males scored higher than females on self-efficacy (p < 0.001), perception (p = 0.017), and curiosity (p < 0.001), and lower on barriers (p < 0.001). The second year students are at the peak of their perception (p = 0.006) and lowest barrier scores (p = 0.003). Students with scientific research experience scored higher in motivation (p = 0.002), self-efficacy (p < 0.001), perception (p < 0.001), and curiosity (p < 0.001). Lack of proper mentoring opportunity (86.2%) and knowledge (84.5%) were the main barriers in conducting research. Even though they have a positive perspective, only a few undergraduates enrolled in research. Medical universities should

A comprehensive stem cell laboratory module with blended learning for medical students at Tongji University

“…The academic workload of Chinese medical students is shown to increase significantly in their second year and the lack of time is one of the most important barriers to participating in scientific research. [15][16][17] Our study, similar to previous studies, 18,19 shows that students are interested in extracurricular research but cannot participate because of time. In the future, providing students more time to engage in other activities, particularly scientific research, may require more effort.…”

Early scientific research training links to the innovation ability of medical undergraduates and postgraduates: a qualitative and quantitative survey

“…However, there was lack of incorporating professional curricula into medical research for undergraduates in China. Even though they have strong interests and motivations, only a few undergraduates enrolled in research [10,12]. Most Chinese medical undergraduates participated in scienti c research through SRT spontaneously.…”

Survey analysis and discussion on cultivating scientific research quality among undergraduates in medical colleges

“…Some differences in the proportion of students who selected academic stress were observed according to the year of study. “Based on a survey of our undergraduate students' research and a review of relevant literature, 7,9,10 we found that among freshmen, 90.4% chose academic stress, probably because at that initial level of tertiary study, students have not yet fully adapted to the pace of university studies and have not implemented a reasonable schedule because of the sudden transition from stressful high school life to relaxed university life. According to the actual situation of our school, we came up with the following results that the reason sophomores (91.2%) chose academic stress may be the large increase in the number of major courses and the need to prepare for CET 4 and 6, which can lead to a general perception of academic stress among sophomores.…”