Motivational Interviewing Intervention With College Student Tobacco Users: Providers' Beliefs and Behaviors

McNamara, Robert S.; Song, Eun-Young; Reboussin, Beth A.; Spangler, John G.; Pockey, Jessica R.; Kimes, Caroline M.; Foley, Kristie L.; Sutfin, Erin L.

doi:10.1080/07448481.2014.1003376

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, understanding potential moderators of MI is critical as it can help develop more tailored MI interventions targeting children’s lifestyle behaviors [ 18 ]. According to Miller and Rollnick [ 19 ], MI practitioners’ training and background and the way in which MI interventions were delivered (in-person or remotely by telephone calls, texts, audio, or video) or implemented (as a core or an adjunct treatment), may modify the intervention effects [ 20 , 21 ]. Potential moderators could include the duration of the MI program, number of in-person sessions, number of targeted lifestyle behaviors, format for delivery, whether it was a core or an add-on component to another existing program, and some important personal characteristics of participants, including children’s baseline weight and biological age [ 22 ].…”

Section: Interventions To Promote Lifestyle Modificationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motivational Interviewing in Pediatric Obesity: A Meta-analysis of the Effects on Behavioral Outcomes

Kao

Ling

et al. 2023

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Currently, the effects of motivational interviewing (MI) on children’s behavioral changes remain obscure. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of MI on children’s lifestyle behavioral changes (fruits and vegetables [F/V], dairy, sugary beverages, calories, snacks, fat intake, moderate vigorous physical activity [MVPA], and screen time). Methods Six databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Sciences) from 2005 to 2022 were searched. Thirty-one intervention studies with a comparison group met the criteria. Random-effects models were performed to estimate the pooled effects; exploratory moderation analyses with mixed-effects models were used to explore potential intervention moderators. Results The pooled effect size was 0.10 (p = .334) on ↑F/V, 0.02 (p = .724) on ↑dairy, −0.29 (p < .001) on ↓calories, −0.16 (p = .054) on ↓sugary beverages, −0.22 (p = .002) on ↓snacks, −0.20 (p = .044) on ↓fat, 0.22 (p = .001) on ↑MVPA, and −0.06 (p = .176) on ↓screen time. The effects of MIs were moderated by ↑MI sessions regarding ↓snacks (B = −0.04, p = .010). Multicomponent and clinical programs had greater effects on dairy intake than their counterparts (0.09 vs. −0.21, p = .034; 0.12 vs. −0.14, p = .027, respectively). Similarly, interventions with a fidelity check resulted in greater dairy intake than those without a check (0.29 vs. −0.15, p = .014). A few long-term follow-up assessments revealed effects on ↓F/V (−0.18; p = .143, k = 2), ↓dairy (−0.13, p = .399, k = 4), ↓MVPA (−0.04; p = .611, k = 6), and ↑screen time (0.12; p = .242, k = 4). Conclusions Our findings support the short-term effects of MI on improving children’s lifestyle behaviors. Additional investigations are needed to better sustain children’s long-term behavioral changes.

show abstract

Section: Interventions To Promote Lifestyle Modificationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motivational Interviewing in Pediatric Obesity: A Meta-analysis of the Effects on Behavioral Outcomes

Kao

Ling

et al. 2023

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It aims to strengthen a patient's personal motivation for, and commitment to, a specific goal by eliciting and exploring the person's own reasons for change within an atmosphere of acceptance and compassion (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). MI has been effectively implemented by a variety of health professionals and for a variety of patient indications, such as managing anxiety (Brody, 2009), smoking cessation (Mcnamara et al, 2015), and diet change (Rubak et al, 2009). MI has a foundational 'spirit', which relies on a compassionate partnership between provider and patient, the evocation of the patient's own ideas around change, and an emphasis on the patient's autonomy (Miller & Moyers, 2007).…”

Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of motivational interviewing in genetic counseling practice and training

Spector

Ash

Garland

et al. 2022

Journal of Genetic Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a counseling approach that allows a provider to engage in a dialog with patients to evoke motivation for health behavior change or decision‐making. MI is a relatively recent addition to the curricula of genetic counseling programs, and recent research has demonstrated its utility in genetic counseling practice. However, the perspectives of genetic counselors trained in MI have yet to be studied with the intent of illuminating how it is applied in practice or what should be emphasized in training. This qualitative study interviewed fifteen genetic counselors from various practice areas who have had training in MI. The interviews focused on how MI is being used in practice, and the strengths and weaknesses of their MI training. Five themes were identified through inductive qualitative analysis: (a) utility of MI in genetic counseling practice, (b) value of MI in genetic counseling training, (c) barriers to implementing MI in genetic counseling practice, (d) barriers to training genetic counselors in MI, and (e) timing of MI training. The perspectives discovered from this study can help inform genetic counseling educators who wish to include MI in their curriculum. In addition for those programs that already include MI, these results serve as a guide for the development of training role‐plays and/or standardized patient encounter scenarios.

show abstract

“…[26][27][28][29][30] According to Miller and Rollnick, 31 MI practitioners' training and background and how to deliver (in-person or remotely by telephone calls) or implement (as a core or an adjunct treatment) MI interventions may modify the intervention effects. [32][33][34] The potential moderation effects could include the duration of MI program, number of in-person sessions, number of targeted lifestyle behaviors, format for delivery, whether it was a core or an add-on component to another existing program, and some important personal characteristics of participants (baseline weight and age).…”

Section: Interventions To Promote Lifestyle Modificationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of motivational interviewing on children's body mass index and fat distributions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Currently, the effects of motivational interviewing (MI) on children's anthropometric changes remain unclear. This systematic review and meta‐analysis examined the effects of MI on children's anthropometric changes (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC], and body fat percentage [BF%]). We also assessed potential moderators of MI on children's BMI changes. This systematic review searched five databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Sciences) from 2005 to 2020 to evaluate the effects of MI interventions that had a comparison group on children's anthropometric change as outcomes (BMI, WC, or BF%). Thirty‐three articles met the inclusion criteria. We performed random‐effects models and exploratory moderation analyses with mixed‐effects models. The pooled effect size of MI was −0.18 (p = 0.002) on BMI, −0.65 (p < 0.001) on WC, and −0.44 (p = 0.005) on children's BF%. The relationship between MI and BMI changes was significantly moderated by the types of intervener (Q = 9.71, p = 0.021) and the existence of supplemental intervention activities (Q = 9.21, p = 0.002). Other potential moderators included children's age, weight status, intervention setting, and targeted behaviors (eating and/or physical activity). Our findings support the effectiveness of MI interventions on improving children's anthropometric outcomes (i.e., BMI, WC, and BF%).

show abstract

Motivational Interviewing Intervention With College Student Tobacco Users: Providers' Beliefs and Behaviors

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

Motivational Interviewing in Pediatric Obesity: A Meta-analysis of the Effects on Behavioral Outcomes

Motivational Interviewing in Pediatric Obesity: A Meta-analysis of the Effects on Behavioral Outcomes

Perceptions of motivational interviewing in genetic counseling practice and training

The effects of motivational interviewing on children's body mass index and fat distributions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About