2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1rp90019f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivations for and barriers to the implementation of diagnostic assessment practices - a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our two research questions are based upon the context provided by research in formative assessment (sometimes synonymous with classroom assessment or assessment for learning). The premise of formative assessment is that teaching and learning is best accomplished within the context of two-way communication between instructor and students. This communication typically includes defining the learning target, conducting measurement of learning while it is happening, giving feedback to both students and instructor during the learning process, and making timely adjustments of teaching and learning activities based on the feedback received. Grading practices are common elements of this formative assessment cycle in that the instructor can learn about student understanding while grading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our two research questions are based upon the context provided by research in formative assessment (sometimes synonymous with classroom assessment or assessment for learning). The premise of formative assessment is that teaching and learning is best accomplished within the context of two-way communication between instructor and students. This communication typically includes defining the learning target, conducting measurement of learning while it is happening, giving feedback to both students and instructor during the learning process, and making timely adjustments of teaching and learning activities based on the feedback received. Grading practices are common elements of this formative assessment cycle in that the instructor can learn about student understanding while grading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Driel et al (1998) O PCK implica uma transformação do conhecimento do conteúdo específico de forma que possa ser utilizado de forma eficaz e flexível no processo de comunicação entre professores e estudantes durante a prática em sala de aula. Deste modo, o PCK dos professores deriva da sua própria prática de ensino (por exemplo, ao analisar as dificuldades de um saber específico) como também na orientação das atividades.…”
Section: O Conhecimento Pedagógico Do Conteúdo (Pck)unclassified
“…Segundo Campos e Nigro (2009), em função da experiência pessoal, a maioria dos jovens professores tende a encarar a avaliação como algo que ocorre somente em momentos isolados, após o processo de ensino-aprendizagem, com a finalidade única de classificar o desempenho dos alunos em bom ou ruim. Turner et al (2011) afirma que a avaliação modifica o ensino e a aprendizagem.…”
Section: Categoria 1 -Visão De Aprendizagemunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some of the literature, DT is used as a synonym for formative assessment (e.g., Black & Wiliam, 1998;Turner, VanderHeide, & Fynewever, 2011). However, similar to DBDM, DT can be used for both formative assessment and summative assessment.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinnings Of Dtmentioning
confidence: 99%