Motivations of undertaking CSR initiatives by independent hotels: a holistic approach

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore how senior managers of independent hotels perceive the notion of corporate social responsibility (CSR) through a holistic analysis of motivations of undertaking both social and environmental initiatives. Design/methodology/approach This study conducts qualitative interviews with 22 Malaysian senior hotel managers together with ethnographic observations. Findings Emergent themes show that CSR is a dynamic concept involving complex struggles and trade-offs between fulfilling business objectives, paying heed to personal ethical values and considering cultural norms when making decisions regarding the adoption of a range of environmental and social initiatives. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to legitimacy theory by highlighting that in the absence of pressure from key stakeholders for responsible initiatives, managers still proactively engage in CSR initiatives. More surprising still is that they set expectations instead of simply aligning or responding to the key stakeholders’ pre-set demands. Meanwhile, the uniqueness, size and purposeful selection of the sample limit the applicability of the findings to wider geographical and cultural locations. Practical implications While Malaysian hotel managers are willing to use CSR practices to demonstrate their commitment to their employees and the local communities where they operate, it is equally important that they utilize other media (such as their websites or social media) for both promotional and legitimacy building purposes. Within the context of growing tourism for economic development, the Malaysian Government can develop more effective strategies, rewards or incentives for encouraging businesses to undertake and improve CSR adoption for sustainability of this industry. Originality/value By extending the scope of CSR studies beyond firm performance issues, we attempt to show the wider set of motivations and contexts considered important in determining hotel engagement in CSR programs.

Effectiveness of sustainability communication on social media: role of message appeal and message source

“…Second, this study adds to the growing body of literature on sustainability and sustainability communication for hospitality services (Ali et al , 2019; Font et al , 2017; Tölkes, 2018, 2020). Although prior studies by Abaeian et al (2019) and Ponnapureddy et al (2020) demonstrated that travelers prefer hotels that undertake corporate social responsibility initiatives, this study extends this stream of literature by examining when and how sustainability communication is effective in persuading travelers to choose eco-friendly hotels when traveling. The study findings indicate that communicating sustainability initiatives and practices effectively is critical for hotels to influence travelers’ minds positively.…”

“Donate to help combat COVID-19!” How typeface affects the effectiveness of CSR marketing?

“…Undoubtedly, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has recently garnered considerable attention in the hospitality industry (Gao et al , 2020; Nyahunzvi, 2013; Wu et al , 2017; Zhang, 2014). A large body of hospitality research demonstrates that practicing CSR not only benefits society but also boosts a brand’s revenue and cultivates customer loyalty (Abaeian et al , 2019; Choi and Seo, 2019; Martínez and Del Bosque, 2013; Nyahunzvi, 2013; Shafieizadeh and Tao, 2020). Importantly, customer participation plays a critical role in the success of hospitality CSR marketing, motivating hospitality organizations to develop various strategies and programs to engage consumers in their CSR efforts (Giebelhausen et al , 2017; Mattila and Hanks, 2013; Wu et al , 2017).…”

What do companies report for their corporate social responsibility practices on their corporate websites? Evidence from a global airline company

“…(1) the content of CSR (Carroll, 1999;Lindgreen and Swaen, 2010;McWilliams, 2015;Volgger and Huang, 2019); (2) how companies integrate or implement CSR practices with their existing processes (Abaeian et al, 2019;Avetisyan and Ferrary, 2013;Basu and Palazzo, 2008;Esbenshade, 2016;Iyer and Jarvis, 2019;Jones Christensen et al, 2014;Ko et al, 2019); (3) how CSR efforts impact firm performance (de Grosbois, 2016;Kang et al, 2016); and, finally; and (4) how and what companies disseminate or report related to their CSR efforts (Bons on and Bednárová, 2015;Marano et al, 2017;Michelon et al, 2015).…”