2013
DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2013.11661650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motives, commitment and student identity in higher education—experiences of non-traditional students in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The interview results indicated different motives for dropping out or continuing to study in the current programme (Thunborg et al, 2013). Two main themes were identified from the interview accounts.…”
Section: Research Question 2: Problematic Study Trajectories and Meanmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The interview results indicated different motives for dropping out or continuing to study in the current programme (Thunborg et al, 2013). Two main themes were identified from the interview accounts.…”
Section: Research Question 2: Problematic Study Trajectories and Meanmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They do, however, seem to struggle in their learning and formation of a learner identityespecially when it comes to the relationship between theory and practice (cf. Lawson 2014, Pearce et al 2008, Taylor and House 2010, Merrill 2015, Field 2012, Thunborg et al 2012, 2013, Ulriksen et al 2017. Both Adam and Irma also seem to form liminal identities (Field 2012) between education and work, trying to be both good students and good employees at the same time; in Irma's case, this appears to be very exhausting, but in Adam's case, it is a way of understanding what he does not want to do.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other articles focus on the formation of different student and learner identities formed through HE (e.g. Lawson 2014, Pearce et al 2008, Taylor and House 2010, Merrill 2015, Field 2012, Thunborg et al 2012, 2013, Ulriksen et al 2017.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A one-sided university pedagogy, imprinted by the increasingly common view of the university as a mediator of knowledge and combined with a larger and more diverse student group risks decreasing the room for the subject-becoming with roots in the different motives and self-images the students express (cf. Thunborg, Bron, and Edström 2013). This makes it important for teachers to be responsive and understanding to the fact that more and more students go against their understanding/ image of what a student is.…”
Section: Conclusion: Didaktik As a Path Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%