2001
DOI: 10.2190/anpm-ln97-aut2-d2ej
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motives of Adolescents to Use the Internet as a Function of Personality Traits, Personal and Social Factors

Abstract: This study investigates the relation between personality traits (Five-Factor-Model), personal (innovativeness, self-efficacy) and social (expectations or relevant reference groups) Internet related factors on the one hand and three motives (information, entertainment and, interpersonal communication) for going on-line among 122 adolescent Internet users on the other hand. The specificity hypothesis was supported in that Internet-specific personal and social factors together accounted for more variance of the 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
80
2
17

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
80
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…En cuanto a la relación entre el uso de Internet y la personalidad, nuestros resultados constatan, que el neuroticismo predice el uso problemático de Internet (Hamburger et al, 2000;Hardie et al, 2007;Viñas, 2009;Wolfradt et al, 2001). Los aspectos teóricos de la dimensión neuroticismo resal-tan el carácter descriptivo de los problemas psicológicos; las personas con puntuaciones altas en este factor tienden a experimentar emociones negativas (John et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En cuanto a la relación entre el uso de Internet y la personalidad, nuestros resultados constatan, que el neuroticismo predice el uso problemático de Internet (Hamburger et al, 2000;Hardie et al, 2007;Viñas, 2009;Wolfradt et al, 2001). Los aspectos teóricos de la dimensión neuroticismo resal-tan el carácter descriptivo de los problemas psicológicos; las personas con puntuaciones altas en este factor tienden a experimentar emociones negativas (John et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Algunos de los estudios reportan una relación positiva con las dimensiones de neuroticismo (Hamburger y Ben-Artzi, 2000;Hardie y Tee, 2007;Tsai et al, 2009;Wolfradt y Doll, 2001) y extraversión (Hamburger et al, 2000). Otros muestran relación negativa con neuroticismo y positiva con apertura y afabilidad (Luo y Ding, 2006).…”
unclassified
“…For example, online communication such as text chat lacks rich social cues and those scoring high in Neuroticism, characterized by anxiety, may be uncomfortable without such cues (cf Amiel & Sargent, 2004). On the other hand, leisure activities such as listening to music or watching movies can be relaxing which could be attractive activities for those high in Neuroticism (Swickert, Hittner, Harris, & Herring, 2002;Wolfradt & Doll, 2001). Thus, to gain a nuanced understanding of personality and online behavior we include a focus on categories of Internet use.…”
Section: Literature Review: Internet Usage and Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence though has not fully supported this: Extraversion was shown to positively correlate with using the Internet to maintain both remote and face-toface friendships (Tosun & Lajunen, 2010) and was positively related to information exchange, which included email (Swickert et al, 2002). With adolescents, Extraversion was correlated with Internet communication (Wolfradt & Doll, 2001). In contrast, Extroversion was found to be negatively correlated with feeling comfortable communicating online (Amiel & Sargent, 2004) and with using online chat (Anolli et al, 2005), also in contrast to the claim of Amichai-Hamburger et al (2002).…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hambrick et al (2010) and Pegoraro (2010) examined athletes' use of Twitter. The two studies each relied on six categories derived from previous research (Clavio 2008;Funk et al 2002;Seo and Green 2008;Wolfradt and Doll 2001): interactivity (responding to fans), diversion (relating to personal life and pop culture or landmark reference), information sharing (relating to business life excluding promoting products), content (links to pictures, videos and Web sites), fanship (other sport or athlete reference), and promotional (promoting products). The two articles found that athletes mainly interact with fans and talk about their private life.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%