2008
DOI: 10.1515/crelle.2008.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivic decomposition of a compactification of a Merkurjev-Suslin variety

Abstract: We provide a motivic decomposition of a twisted form of a smooth hyperplane section of Gr(3,6). This variety is a norm variety corresponding to a symbol in K M 3 /3. As an application we construct a torsion element in the Chow group of this variety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any smooth compactification of E is a norm variety of the element s := [D] ∪(c) ∈ H 3 et (F, Z/pZ (2)). It has been shown by N. Semenov in [26] for p = 3 (and char F = 0) that the motive of a certain smooth equivariant compactification of E decomposes in a direct sum, where one of the summands is the Rost motive of s, another summand is a motive ε vanishing over any field extension of F splitting D, and each of the remaining summands is a shift of the motive of the Severi-Brauer variety of D. All these summands (but ε) are indecomposable and ε was expected to be 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Any smooth compactification of E is a norm variety of the element s := [D] ∪(c) ∈ H 3 et (F, Z/pZ (2)). It has been shown by N. Semenov in [26] for p = 3 (and char F = 0) that the motive of a certain smooth equivariant compactification of E decomposes in a direct sum, where one of the summands is the Rost motive of s, another summand is a motive ε vanishing over any field extension of F splitting D, and each of the remaining summands is a shift of the motive of the Severi-Brauer variety of D. All these summands (but ε) are indecomposable and ε was expected to be 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We note that the compactification in [26] (for p = 3) has the property required in Theorem 1.1 (see Example 10.6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can also be used to obtain informations on gr K ′ 0 (X). For example, a direct consequence of Proposition 8.3 is that gr 2 K ′ 0 (D) is contains non-zero 3-torsion, where D is the variety of [Sem08] (over a field of characteristic zero).…”
Section: Relation With Steenrod Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.5 Example. An example of a non-homogeneous variety which possesses a special correspondence for p = 3 was provided recently by N. Semenov (see [Se08]). By Theorem 1.3 it also provides an example of a 4-splitting variety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%