1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(84)90019-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor control of schizophrenics—II. Manual control and tracking: Sensory and motor deficits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with results of other authors, there was no relationship between task performance and dosage of neuroleptic medication [Killian et al, 1984], The finding of a highly significant decrease in task performance of the total group with higher target speed (VTP2 vs. VTP4) is in accordance with the report by Mather and Putchat [1984], Their ratio of hand move ment time to target time increased disproportionally with higher target velocity in schizophrenics compared to normals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In accordance with results of other authors, there was no relationship between task performance and dosage of neuroleptic medication [Killian et al, 1984], The finding of a highly significant decrease in task performance of the total group with higher target speed (VTP2 vs. VTP4) is in accordance with the report by Mather and Putchat [1984], Their ratio of hand move ment time to target time increased disproportionally with higher target velocity in schizophrenics compared to normals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A few studies have specifically addressed the intactness of the smooth pursuit system in persons with schizophrenia. Mather and Putchat (1982/1983, 1984) reported pursuit gains in persons with schizophrenia that were similar to those for normal control subjects. Five other investigations, however, have offered evidence that a subset of persons with schizophrenia may have low gain pursuit.…”
Section: Emd As a Biological Marker For Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The target excursions commonly used by psychopathology researchers studying EMD may confound more specific examination and characterization of eye movements on two accounts. First, the “standard” excursions used by most experimenters are ±10 degrees of visual angle (a few studies have used targets up to ±15 and ±20 degrees of visual angle [Couch & Fox, 1934; Levin et al, 1988; Mather, 1985, 1986; Mather & Putchat, 1982/1983, 1984; Schmid-Burgk, Becker, Diekmann, Jurgens, & Kornhuber, 1982; Whicker et al, 1985; Yee et al, 1987]: These are certainly the exception). Targets usually begin from central fixation and are sinusoidal (approximating the movement of a pendulum in the horizontal plane), although some researchers use triangular wave targets.…”
Section: Stimulus Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A motoric data limitation is not the only source of poor performance, and a multiple-resource model may be needed (e.g., Navon & Gopher, 1979). Mather and Putchat (1984) studied manual control and tracking in schizophrenic subjects and concluded that both attentional and motor disturbances were involved. We presume that the former are likely to characterize the grip performance of affective subjects, in keeping with Rosofsky, Levin, and Holzman (1982), and when tested in greater numbers, such subjects may prove to be significantly different from normal control subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%