Muscular Dystrophy 2012
DOI: 10.5772/30752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor Function Measure Scale (MFM): New Instrument for Follow-Up Brazilian Patients with Neuromuscular Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These items were selected so that all participants could be tested in a similar manner, despite their level of ambulation and could be performed in approximately 10 min (Bushby & Connor 2011 ; Mazzone et al 2012 ). Each item on the MFM is scored on a four-point scale, with zero if the participant is unable to perform the task or cannot maintain the starting position whilst performing the task, and three reflects the ability to perform the task with a controlled (normal) movement pattern (Iwabe et al 2014 ; MFM user manual: https://mfm-nmd.org/obtenir-un-manuel-utilisateur/https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/cohens-d/ ). Therefore, in this study, participants’ MFM score was expressed out of 30, for the 10 items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These items were selected so that all participants could be tested in a similar manner, despite their level of ambulation and could be performed in approximately 10 min (Bushby & Connor 2011 ; Mazzone et al 2012 ). Each item on the MFM is scored on a four-point scale, with zero if the participant is unable to perform the task or cannot maintain the starting position whilst performing the task, and three reflects the ability to perform the task with a controlled (normal) movement pattern (Iwabe et al 2014 ; MFM user manual: https://mfm-nmd.org/obtenir-un-manuel-utilisateur/https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/cohens-d/ ). Therefore, in this study, participants’ MFM score was expressed out of 30, for the 10 items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%