1984
DOI: 10.1017/s0020268100041561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor insurance rating, an actuarial approach

Abstract: This paper is largely based on a Ph.D. thesis (Coutts (1983)) and provides an actuarial approach to the technical aspects of motor insurance premium rating, where equal weights are given to both the practical and statistical elements of the problem. The methods described are applicable to the competitive United Kingdom motor insurance premium market. However, it is also contended that in countries where motor rating tariffs are in operation, the analyses proposed are still necessary for management to judge whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models such as those described in the subsequent sections have been used to describe claim rates in, for example, general insurance but not in life assurance. References from the United Kingdom actuarial literature include Johnson and Hey,(2) Grimes, (3) Bennett(4) and Coutts (5) We take advantage of the GLIM statistical package in carrying out the modelling required. Details are provided in § § 3, 4 and 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models such as those described in the subsequent sections have been used to describe claim rates in, for example, general insurance but not in life assurance. References from the United Kingdom actuarial literature include Johnson and Hey,(2) Grimes, (3) Bennett(4) and Coutts (5) We take advantage of the GLIM statistical package in carrying out the modelling required. Details are provided in § § 3, 4 and 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk premium for the i-th risk class, i=1,2,…,n, can be equated as the product of estimated claim frequency and estimated average claim cost (severity) for all claim categories [1][2][3][4][5]. As such, if we have three claim categories, the risk premium is…”
Section: Risk Premium Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bennett came down in favour of the additive model, largely on the grounds that it could be fitted relatively simply. For claim sizes, Baxter et al used an additive model, but failed to find a satisfactory error structure (a fact clear from their paper, but only later made explicit by Coutts (1984)). Baxter, Coutts & Ross (1980) attempted to remedy this.…”
Section: The Two Main Aspects Of Premium Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%