2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motor skill learning induces brain network plasticity: A diffusion-tensor imaging study

Abstract: Motor skills and the acquisition of brain plasticity are important topics in current research. The development of non-invasive white matter imaging technology, such as diffusion-tensor imaging and the introduction of graph theory make it possible to study the effects of learning skills on the connection patterns of brain networks. However, few studies have characterized the brain network topological features of motor skill learning, especially open skill. Given the need to interact with environmental changes i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results demonstrated reduced connections between these brain regions and the remaining brain voxels in the SA group. The findings were consistent with the previous research, regardless of skilled groups, such as racing-car drivers (Bernardi et al, 2013), table tennis players (Guo et al, 2017), basketball players (Pi et al, 2019), golfers (Milton et al, 2007), and musicians (Haslinger et al, 2004;Meister et al, 2005). The possible explanation could be that athletes' brain might exhibit an improved neural efficiency in the brain regions associated with attentional-motor modulation and executive control along with a reduced "resource consumption" (Rypma and Prabhakaran, 2009;Bernardi et al, 2013;Guo et al, 2017;Sommer et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Figure 3 | (Left)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Such results demonstrated reduced connections between these brain regions and the remaining brain voxels in the SA group. The findings were consistent with the previous research, regardless of skilled groups, such as racing-car drivers (Bernardi et al, 2013), table tennis players (Guo et al, 2017), basketball players (Pi et al, 2019), golfers (Milton et al, 2007), and musicians (Haslinger et al, 2004;Meister et al, 2005). The possible explanation could be that athletes' brain might exhibit an improved neural efficiency in the brain regions associated with attentional-motor modulation and executive control along with a reduced "resource consumption" (Rypma and Prabhakaran, 2009;Bernardi et al, 2013;Guo et al, 2017;Sommer et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Figure 3 | (Left)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Neuroimaging studies of people performing finger movements revealed that long-term training could activate finger representation in the sensorimotor cortex 39. Diffusion tensor imaging studies also suggested that high-level, broad-skilled athletes with a long history of skill learning showed higher nodal parameters in their visual and attention networks than ordinary individuals, leading to quicker and more effective processing of visual information 40. Thus, future research might investigate whether a longer duration of MTr can achieve improvements in motor function that are sustained for a longer time, and whether the neurophysiological changes during and after training may differ from those achieved by short-term training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the present study, we did not find a significant correlation between increased slow 5 fALFF in the left IPL and left LTC and a decrease in HDRS. The possible causes of these results were that the functions of these brain regions were mainly involved in cognition, auditory, and language function: the IPL is mainly related to cognitive functions, including memory retrieval and bottom-up attention ( 81 ); the MTG mainly takes part in motor skill learning ( 82 ) and short-term verbal memory ( 83 ); and the STG is generally considered a part of the high-order auditory cortex ( 84 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%