“…Fossil-derived plastics have been widely adopted in the packaging industry due to their low cost, easy processability, light weight, and desired mechanical and barrier properties . However, most of these plastics are nonbiodegradable, and their production, use, and end-of-life profile show an open-loop life cycle; as a result, they end up in landfills or the natural environment, which will accumulate up to 12 billion metric tons by 2050, causing severe environmental impacts and ecosystem threats. , To tackle this global challenge and align with UN sustainable development goals, the packaging industry is transitioning to renewable, recyclable, and eco-friendly fiber-based packaging solutions, especially in the food and beverage packaging sectors. , However, cellulosic fiber-based materials (e.g., paper, paperboard, and molded pulp) are porous, hygroscopic, and thus susceptible to the permeation of various liquids (e.g., water, oil, and grease) and gases (e.g., moisture, oxygen, and aroma), significantly compromising their barrier performance, which are vital to extending the shelf life and improving the safety and quality of packaged goods. To address the barrier functionality gaps between traditional holistic fossil plastic-based and fiber-based packaging, various barrier technologies have been implemented, including lamination, metallization, extrusion coatings, and polymer dispersion or solution coatings. , However, nonrenewable, nonbiodegradable materials (e.g., synthetic polymer latexes, metals/metal oxides) and the multilayer structural design commonly employed in these technologies adversely impact the recyclability of fiber-based packaging …”